In addition, smaller-sized prior art balls that are not stuck in their seats still might not return to the surface because the pressure differential across the ball due to the uprising current in the large
diameter casing might not be significant enough to overcome gravity.
Consequently, while such smaller-sized balls may not completely block a zone, they are still likely to impede production by partially blocking the wellbore.
Additionally, frac plugs can be inadvertently set at undesired locations in the wellbore casing creating unwanted constrictions.
The constrictions may latch wellbore tools that are run for future operations and cause unwanted removal process.
However, they do not teach any methodology by which frac balls change shape by melting,
phase change, strength, or elasticity to address a wide variety of
system applications, including but not limited to wellbore plug isolation.
In addition, the process of drilling and milling the plugs creates debris that needs to be removed in another operation.
The prior art as detailed above suffers from the following deficiencies:Prior art systems do not provide for positioning a ball seat at a desired location after a wellbore casing has been installed, without depending on a predefined sleeve location integral to the wellbore casing to position the plug.Prior art systems do not provide for isolating multiple
hydraulic fracturing zones without the need for a milling operation.Prior art systems do not provide for positioning restrictive elements that could be removed in a feasible, economic, and timely manner.Prior art systems do not provide for setting larger inner
diameter sleeves to allow unrestricted well production fluid flow.Prior art systems cause undesired premature preset conditions preventing further wellbore operations.
While some of the prior art may teach some solutions to several of these problems, the core issue of isolating
hydraulic fracturing zones without the need for a milling operation has not been addressed by prior art.
While the use of degradable / dissolvable frac balls has been proven for many years, they have certain limitations.
The prior art as detailed above suffers from the following deficiencies:Prior art systems do not provide for restriction plug elements (frac balls) comprising meltable eutectic alloys that change phase due to wellbore temperature.Prior art systems do not provide for restriction plug elements (frac balls) comprising compositions that change strength due to wellbore temperature.Prior art systems do not provide for restriction plug elements comprising meltable material that melts to create flow passages.Prior art systems do not provide for restriction plug elements held together by an un-bonded mechanical insert.Prior art systems do not provide for restriction plug elements with a cooling flow channel to keep the
plug in solid state before liquefying.Prior art systems do not provide for restriction sleeve member with a cooling flow channel to retain a restriction plug element in
solid state before liquefying in the presence of wellbore fluids.Prior art systems do not provide for restriction plug elements with dual chambers comprising a meltable eutectic
alloy in one chamber that melts to deform and distort the plug element.Prior art methods do not provide for effectively reducing overall
cycle time for stage fracturing.Prior art systems do not provide for cost effective restriction plug elements.Prior art systems require an acidic environment to degrade frac balls.Prior art systems that use PGA frac balls erode or pit wellbore casing.Prior art methods have no control on the amount of
exposure of the frac balls to wellbore and frac fluids.