Projection optical system

Abstract

A projection optical system for performing enlargement projection from a primary image surface on the reduction side to a secondary image surface on the enlargement side has, from the primary image surface side, a lens optical system including two or more lens elements sharing a common rotation-symmetry axis and each having an optical power, a first reflective optical element having an optical power, and a second reflective optical element having a negative optical power. The projection optical system is non-telecentric toward the reduction side, and a prescribed condition is.

Description

[0001]This application is based on Japanese Patent Application No. 2004-119501 filed on Apr. 14, 2004, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0002]1. Field of the Invention[0003]The present invention relates to a projection optical system, and more particularly to a projection optical system that incorporates reflective and refractive optical elements in an optical construction suitable for rear projection.[0004]2. Description of Related Art[0005]In a projection optical system for performing wide-angle enlargement projection from a primary image surface on the reduction side to a secondary image surface on the enlargement side, disposing in the optical path a negative mirror closer to the secondary image surface is effective in reducing chromatic aberration and distortion. Projection optical systems including a negative mirror for reducing chromatic and other aberrations are proposed, for example, in Patent Publications 1 to 3 listed b...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

The system achieves a wider angle with improved optical performance, reduced size, and lower production costs by optimizing the optical path and element placement, while maintaining image surface flatness and correcting aberrations effectively.

Problems solved by technology

However, increasing the absolute value of the optical power of the negative mirror causes the Petzval sum to become lopsided in the positive direction.

This, however, cannot be done without lengthening the focal length of the refractive lens group, and thus brings an effect contrary to a wider angle.

Moreover, in a telecentric system, it is essential to dispose in the optical path a lens element having a strong positive optical power (causing the Petzval sum to be shifted in the positive direction) on the primary image surface side of the refractive lens group, and this makes it difficult to achieve a wider angle.

Doing any of these eventually makes the projection apparatus larger and increases costs.

However, as described above, the use of larger reflective optical elements and of a wider-angle refractive lens group makes it extremely difficult to lay out the optical path inside the rear projection apparatus, and thus makes it impossible to achieve a wider angle.

This increases the optical path length through the projection optical system, and is thus unsuitable for aiming at a wider angle or making the projection apparatus slim.

Such a shape, however, cannot be produced by turning, and its production and evaluation require sophisticated technologies as compared with a rotation-symmetric shape.

This may lead to higher costs.

The Petzval sum, if shifted in the positive direction by a negative mirror, can be shifted back in the negative direction with a positive mirror, but those are not achieved because of the other part of the construction and the inevitable restrictions.

This makes the optical path length greater and requires larger optical elements, and is thus unsuitable for aiming at a wider angle and further compactness.

Thus, this construction hardly differs from a coaxial optical system whose optical path is bent a plurality of times simply with flat reflective surfaces, and is thus unsuitable for aiming at a wider angle and further slimness.

Moreover, the inclination of the first mirror with respect to the screen shortens the optical path length at the top end of the screen, making the construction unsuitable for aiming at a wider angle by increasing the degree of eccentricity or of shifting.

This makes it difficult to correct for aberrations, and is thus unsuitable for aiming at higher performance.

Moreover, as increasingly wider angles are aimed at, the magnification of the projection optical system increases, and the second and third mirrors become larger as measured on the YZ plane (see FIG. 2 of the Patent Publication 3), making them difficult to produce and increasing costs.

Thus, this construction is unsuitable for aiming at a wider angle, further slimness, and lower cost.

Images