Judgment Method for Anode Leakage Failure of Glass Fiber Bundle
A judging method and technology of glass fiber bundles, applied in the direction of measuring electricity, measuring electrical variables, instruments, etc., can solve the problem of the decrease of the initial resistance value of the detection resistance, the failure of leakage current, and the reduction of the effectiveness and accuracy of the anode leakage experiment of glass fiber bundles and other problems to achieve the effect of eliminating misjudgment, improving accuracy, and eliminating inherent pollution
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0037] Such as image 3 As shown, the method for judging the anode leakage failure of glass fiber bundles provided by the present invention can effectively eliminate most of the anode leakage failures of glass fiber bundles caused by non-CAF factors, specifically as follows:
[0038] Step S1: Carry out the glass fiber bundle anode leakage test on the test sample, and after the experiment, measure the first detection resistance value between the selected sampling points on the test sample, if the first detection resistance value and the selected sampling point When the ratio of the initial resistance is within the first threshold range, a surface inspection is performed on the test sample / between the test points on the test sample, and the pollutants on the test hole chain found after the surface inspection are removed. Wherein, in step S1, the ratio of each detection resistance value between the sampling points on the test sample to the initial resistance value is within the f...
Embodiment 2
[0057] The difference between this embodiment and Embodiment 1 is that the determination method in this embodiment only includes step S1, step S2 and step S3, but does not include step S4.
[0058] In step S3, use deionized water to clean the entire test sample for the first time, then use a compressed air gun to dry the entire test sample, and measure the third detection between the two sampling points after the first cleaning of the test sample Resistance.
[0059] In this embodiment, the third detection resistance value between the sampling points after the first cleaning is about 8.9E+9 ohms. The ratio of the resistance value to the initial resistance value is within the second threshold range (that is, the two change within the same power range of 10), indicating that liquid pollutants have affected the resistance value change between the two sampling points, so it is determined that there is no CAF failure phenomenon occurs, the processing and measurement are terminated...
Embodiment 3
[0062] The difference between this embodiment and Embodiment 1 is that the determination method in this embodiment only includes step S1 and step S2, but does not include step S3 and step S4.
[0063] In step S2, the second detection resistance value between the sampling points on the test sample after the pollutants are removed is measured, and the second detection resistance value is compared with the initial resistance value to determine whether the test sample has glass fiber Bundle anode leakage failure phenomenon: If the ratio of the second detection resistance value to the initial resistance value is within the second threshold range, it is judged that the test sample has no glass fiber bundle anode leakage failure phenomenon; if the ratio of the second detection resistance value to the initial resistance value If the ratio is within the first threshold range, it is judged that the glass fiber bundle anode leakage failure has occurred in the test sample.
[0064] Other ...
PUM
Login to View More Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 