Method and device for evaluating fighting capability of air defense and antimissile system

Abstract

The invention provides a method and a device for evaluating fighting capability of an air defense and antimissile system. The method comprises the following steps: establishing a fighting capability evaluation model based on an evaluation index corresponding to a fighting activity, obtaining quantitative indicator data of a to-be-evaluated air defense and antimissile system based on the model, andbuilding a corresponding capability requirement satisfaction degree evaluation matrix; based on the evaluation index, using an interpretative structural modeling method to construct an index networkhierarchical model corresponding to the to-be-evaluated air defense and antimissile system; based on the index network hierarchical model, using a network hierarchical analytic method to calculate theweight corresponding to each evaluation index; and evaluating the comprehensive fighting capability of the to-be-evaluated air defense and antimissile system based on the weight corresponding to eachevaluation index and the capability requirement satisfaction degree evaluation matrix corresponding to the quantitative index data. The method and the device for evaluating fighting capability of theair defense and antimissile system in the invention can deeply analyze and directly reflect the internal logical relationship of the air defense and antimissile indicator system, so that the weight distribution between the indicators is more reasonable, thereby effectively improving the comprehensiveness, effectiveness and credibility of the evaluation results.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to the technical field of weapon equipment system construction, and more specifically, to a method and device for evaluating the combat capability of an air defense and anti-missile system. Background technique [0002] With the continuous development of military technology in various countries, the equipment for air strike operations tends to be diversified, and the combat environment also tends to be complicated. In order to cope with the complex combat environment, it is necessary to speed up the construction of the air defense and anti-missile system and improve the comprehensive combat capability of the system. The assessment of the combat capability of the system can promptly and effectively discover the weak links in the system and equipment, thereby providing scientific decision-making for the development and planning of the system and equipment. Therefore, the air defense and anti-missile system needs a complete and feas...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0004] However, the above-mentioned methods all have some defects to a certain extent.

Among them, when the fuzzy evaluation method deals with too many indicators and the division of the language set is too fine, there will be "explosion of reasoning rules", which will bring great difficulties to fuzzy synthesis.

Analytic Hierarchy Process can make better use of expert experience, but this method ignores the mutual influence relationship between indicators, so it is not suitable for air defense and anti-missile systems with complex internal structures and closely related combat activities

Although the network analysis method considers the correlation between various indicators, there is no unified and scientific method for the establishment of the indicator network hierarchical model, which increases the uncertainty of the evaluation

Images