As each
bulb of each string is connected in series, when a single
bulb fails to illuminate for any reason, the whole string fails to light and it is very frustrating and
time consuming to locate and replace a defective bulb or bulbs.
In fact, in many instances, the
frustration and
time consuming efforts are so great as to cause one to completely discard and replace the string with a new string before they are even placed in use.
The problem is even more compounded when multiple bulbs simultaneously fail to illuminate for multiple reasons, such as, for example, one or more faulty light bulbs, one or more unstable socket connections, or one or more light bulbs physically fall from their respective sockets, and the like.
However, in
actual practice, it has been found that such short circuiting feature within the bulb does not always operate in the manner intended and the entire string will go out whenever a single bulb burns out.
Even though each of the foregoing techniques have met with some limited success, none of such devices and techniques have yet been able to further solve the additional problems of the entire string of lights going out as a direct result of either a defective socket, a light bulb being improperly placed in the socket, a broken or bent wire of a light bulb, or whenever a light bulb is either intentionally removed from its socket or is merely dislodged from its socket during handling or from movement after being strung on the Christmas tree, particularly in outdoor installations subject to wind or other climatic conditions.
It is stated therein that the use of either a single or a plurality of parallel connected Zener diodes will not protect the lamps against normal failure caused by normal current flows, but will protect against failures due to excessive current surges associated with the failure of associated lamps.
However, to the knowledge of Applicant, none of such arrangements have ever become commercially feasible.
Some of these prior art shunts cause a reduced current flow in the series string because of too high of a
voltage drop occurring across the shunt when a bulb becomes inoperable, either due to an open filament, a faulty bulb, a faulty socket, or simply because the bulb is not mounted properly in the socket, or is entirely removed or falls from its respective socket.
However, other shunt devices cause the opposite effect due to an undesired increase in current flow.
For example, when the voltage dropped across a socket decreases, then a higher voltage is applied to all of the remaining bulbs in the string, which higher voltage results in higher current flow and a decreased
life expectancy of the remaining bulbs in the string.
Additionally, such higher voltage also results in increased light output from each of the remaining bulbs in the string, which may not be desirable in some instances.
However, when the voltage dropped across a socket increases, then a lower voltage is applied to all of the remaining bulbs in the series connected string, which results in lesser current flow and a corresponding decrease in light output from each of the remaining bulbs in the string.
Such undesirable effect occurs in all of the prior art attempts, including those which, at first blush, might be considered the most promising techniques, especially the proposed use of a
diode in series with a bilateral switch in the Fleck '449 patent, or the proposed use of a
metal oxide varistor in the above Harnden '966 patent, or the use of the proposed counter-connected rectifiers in the Swiss '021 patent.
Additionally, as such an arrangement does not permit more that one bulb to be out at the same time, certain additional desirable
special effects such as “twinkling”, and the like, obviously would not be possible.
They are designed for use as spike absorbers and are not designed to function as a
voltage regulator or as a
steady state current dissipation circuit.
While metal oxide varistors may appear in some cases similar to back-to-back Zener diodes, they are not interchangeable and function very differently according to their particular use.
This low value of resistance results in a substantial increase in the voltage being applied to the remaining bulbs even when only a single bulb is inoperative for any of the reasons previously stated.
Thus, when multiple bulbs are inoperative, a still greater voltage is applied to the remaining bulbs, thereby again substantially increasing their illumination, and consequently, substantially shortening their
life expectancy.
In contrast, by utilizing a shunt of the type proposed by Applicant, substantially all of the bulbs in a 50 bulb string can become inoperative for any or all of the reasons previously stated, with only a minimal decrease in intensity of illumination of the remaining bulbs, which is not possible with any of the foregoing shunts.
Obviously, such a scheme is not always effective, particularly when a bulb is removed from its socket or becomes damaged in handling, etc.
While this particular locking technique apparently is very effective to keep bulbs from falling from their respective sockets, the replacement of defective bulbs by the average user is extremely difficult, if not sometimes impossible, without resorting to mechanical gripping devices which can actually destroy the bulb base unit or socket.