Flapper gate forming tube assembly for packaged produce containers
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Benefits of technology
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
example 1
Product-In-Seal Rates in Produce Packaging Devices
[0062]FIG. 6 depicts testing results comparing a packaging device having flapper gate assembly to a control device without a flapper gate assembly. As an indicia of performance, the number of occurrences where lettuce product was caught in the sealing jaws were recorded.
[0063]With regard to FIG. 6, the columns designated “# PIS” represent the recorded number of product-in-seal failures, the columns designated “# Tested” represent the number of packages tested, and the columns designated “% PIS Leaker” represent the percentage of tested packages that experienced product-in-seal failures resulting in leaking packages. The values shown in the columns designated “n1”, “n2”, “p1”, “p2”, and “Pi Hat” are the number of tested packages formed by the flapper gate device, the number of tested packages formed by the control device, the percentage of product-in-seal failures for the flapper gate device, the percentage of product-in-seal failures...
example 2
Metal Contamination in Produce Packaging Devices
[0069]A review of metal contamination results shows that flapper gate assemblies located in the mid-to-lower portion of the forming tube were used in 15 percent of VFFS machines but contributed 30 percent of the metal contamination due to nuts, bolts and other metal parts falling off the linkage assembly that drives the flapper gate. Because the flapper gate assembly had no removable parts inside the forming tube, it reduced total metal contamination by 30 percent.
PUM
| Property | Measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Flow rate | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


