Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

Ticket auction

a technology of tickets and auctions, applied in the field of online auctions, can solve the problems of affecting the quality of tickets sold, failure to optimize the pricing, and often selling out tickets for a given performance, and achieve the effect of eliminating chaos

Inactive Publication Date: 2010-08-17
F POSZAT HU
View PDF4 Cites 6 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0010]It is the object of this invention to remedy the above as well as related deficiencies in the prior art. In particular, one object of this invention is to provide an automated method for remotely auctioning tickets that eliminates chaos resulting from cancellation and lowering of previously entered bids.
[0012]It is yet another object of the invention to allow each participant in a remote auction to bypass the bidding process entirely and ensure purchase of tickets.
[0020]At the expiration of the bidding period, the central computer that runs the auction assigns all available tickets so as to maximize total amount received. Thus, selecting options 2-4 increases the participant's chances of obtaining the tickets at the bid amount because, for example, single seats may be filled.

Problems solved by technology

Moreover, setting ticket prices well in advance of a performance, and keeping ticket prices constant, often misjudges the demand and fails to optimize pricing.
Not surprisingly, tickets for a given performance often sell out upon their release; for ongoing events, patrons often have to wait too long to get desired tickets.
Alternatively, if the ticket prices are set too high, many tickets may remain unsold, also reducing the total amount collected by the event's producer, despite higher average ticket price.
Because producers, as most people, prefer a bird in hand to two in the bushes, tickets are practically always underpriced.
First, allowing bidders to lower or even cancel their bids wreaks havoc with the auctioning process.
In sum, allowing cancellation and lowering of the bids creates uncertainty, even chaos.
Another disadvantage is that remote auctions differ from live auctions.
Indeed, it would be difficult to conduct a widely accessible remote auction in real time because of potential for telecommunication equipment overload caused by simultaneous attempts of multiple bidders to place or change their bids.
This is an inconvenience; moreover, because most bidding will probably be done towards the conclusion of the auction, telecommunication equipment can still become overloaded, preventing the bidder from raising his bid.
Yet another problem with Brett's method is that the contiguity requirement is the same for all the bidders; i.e., the algorithm that ensures contiguous seating operates on all the bids; it does not allow each bidder, individually, to specify whether the bidder will accept scattered seats.
Similarly, the algorithm does not allow each bidder to specify initially whether partially filled orders are acceptable.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Ticket auction
  • Ticket auction
  • Ticket auction

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

Embodiment Construction

[0023]According to the method of this invention, producers of entertainment events transmit the following information to the central computer (101) that implements the method:[0024]1. A seating chart (102) of a theater or stadium (“auditorium”);[0025]2. Seats to be auctioned;[0026]3. Available performance dates (100);[0027]4. Current price schedules (108) for different sections (110) of the auditorium; and[0028]5. Deadline (112) for accepting offers.

[0029]The ticket seller of the auction may break the available seats for the same event into multiple auctions, and thereby further minimizing scalping.

[0030]Templates (114) for the auditorium are obtained before an auction and stored on the central computer (100). The best sources I know for these templates (114) are the following books: Sandy Millman, SEATS (for New York area), and Denise Cady, GOOD SEATS (for Los Angeles and Chicago). The template (114) is displayed to the general public on the auction's Web site (116).

[0031]When a po...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

No PUM Login to View More

Abstract

This computer-based Internet ticket auctioning method preregisters potential bidders and advises them that all bids are conditional offers to purchase tickets, and therefore cannot be lowered or canceled at will. The auction's organizer programs the computer that runs the auction with dates and locations of various events, and with auditoria layout and locations of seats to be auctioned. Each registered customer can view the layout of a particular auditorium and submit a bid for one or more seats. The bidder specifies whether a partially filled order and noncontiguous seat assignments are acceptable. The bidder is also provided with an option to engage a “proxy bid” that will increase the bid amount up to a limit set by the bidder, in order to ensure purchase of tickets. Each customer can also choose to bypass the auction process entirely, by submitting a purchase order at a high, preset price. This preset price is automatically accepted and purchase of tickets is guaranteed. At the conclusion of the auction, the computer runs a seat allocation algorithm that assigns the seats to the bidders so as to maximize the total amount realized from the auction. The seat assignment algorithm is also run periodically during the auction in order to determine which bidders have already being outbid, and to allow them to raise their bids.

Description

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS[0001]This application is a Reissue application of U.S. Ser. No. 09 / 565,532, filed May 5, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,003,485, granted Feb. 21, 2006, which claims the priority benefits of copending U.S. Provisional Application No. 60 / 133,013, filed on 7 May 1999.TECHNICAL FIELD[0002]This invention relates to the field of on-line auctions, and particularly to on-line auctions of tickets for entertainment events.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0003]Seats for theatrical, musical, sporting, and other events are typically sold based on a pricing system that uses broad categorizations for seat locations. For example, all orchestra seats in a theater usually are uniformly priced for a given performance. The same system applies to sporting events. All tickets for movies are priced uniformly for each showing, though discounts for certain classes of people, e.g., students and senior citizens, may be available.[0004]This simple system disregards the fact that ...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & Authority Patents(United States)
IPC IPC(8): G06Q40/00
CPCG06Q30/08G06Q40/04
Inventor YOUNG, DALE
Owner F POSZAT HU
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products