Pelvic cavity pressure receptor

Abstract

A pelvic cavity pressure receptor belongs to the technical field of gynecology medical instruments, which comprises a pelvic pressure sensing rod, a lead, a protecting wing, a signal collector and a deconcentrator joint, wherein the pelvic pressure sensing rod comprises three parts, namely a long hollow rod body, a pressure sensing element and a protection sleeve; the pressure sensing element is inserted in the outer surface of the body; the pressure sensing element is an optical fiber self-sensing element; the pressure sensing element and the body are designed as a whole; the protection sleeve sleeves the whole body in a removable way for protecting the pressure sensing element; an opening end of at an end of the body and the protecting wing are fixed together; the inner part of the protecting wing is a hollow structure; the deconcentrator joint is set inside the protecting wing; one end of the deconcentrator joint is connected to the pressure sensing element and the other end thereof is connected to one end of the lead at the outside of the protecting wing; and the other end of the lead is connected to the signal collector. By utilizing the pelvic cavity pressure receptor provided herein, a weak area of the pelvic organ can be accurately judged.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to a pelvic organ pressure receptor, in particular to a pelvic organ pressure sensing device, which is a tool for inspection and diagnosis, and belongs to the technical field of gynecological medical instruments. technical background [0002] At present, the evaluation of the severity of pelvic organ prolapse is mostly based on the POP-Q score, that is, the subjective judgment of the doctor's gynecological examination. The evaluation criteria are not objective and accurate, and are mostly based on the personal experience of clinicians. The accuracy of the evaluation varies. There are different opinions, and it is difficult to form a consensus, and the specific weak parts of the pelvic organs cannot be accurately judged. Therefore, it is not possible to accurately judge whether the anterior and posterior vaginal walls should be repaired while choosing the surgical method and repairing uterine prolapse. Objective evaluation indicato...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0004] (1) At present, there are no suitable measurement tools and evaluation indicators for the degree of prolapse in patients with pelvic organ prolapse, and the severity and distribution of prolapse in various parts

[0005] (2) The standard for evaluating the severity of prolapse depends on the POP-Q score and the doctor's gynecological examination, which is too subjective to reach a consensus and lacks objective evaluation indicators

[0006] (3) There are no appropriate evaluation tools and criteria for the risk assessment of organ prolapse in the future for patients with postpartum, mild prolapse, postoperative prolapse, etc.

[0007] (4) The weak area cannot be accurately judged when choosing pelvic organ prolapse surgery, and consensus cannot be reached on the selection of diagnosis and surgical methods

[0008] (5) The clinician's judgment on the degree of pelvic organ prolapse is mostly limited to the gynecological examination in the gynecological outpatient clinic, and the patient is often unable to reproduce the most serious state of prolapse during the outpatient examination, which affects the judgment of the disease

Images