A purification device and purification method for multi-polluting gas in tunnels and parking spaces
A technology of polluting gases and purification devices, which is applied in the field of air purification, can solve the problems of high purification cost and narrow application range of air purification devices, and achieve the effects of reducing removal rate, improving air quality and improving photocatalytic efficiency
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0072] Preparation of photocatalyst:
[0073] Step (1): Dissolve PdCl with water 2 Stir to dissolve and make into PdCl 2 Solution, add water and stir to dilute for about 10-30 minutes;
[0074] Step (2): to PdCl 2 Add titanium oxide powder into the solution, as Pd, control the mass ratio of Pd to titanium oxide to 0.0005:1, and stir for 0.5 to 3 hours;
[0075] Step (3): Add silicon carbide into the solution system of step (2), soak for about 0.5-10 minutes, take it out and dry it in the air; Step (4): place the dried material at a temperature of 30-100°C for Drying to prepare Pd-doped silicon carbide supported titanium dioxide (photocatalyst).
[0076] Preparation of Adsorbent Material:
[0077] Prepare a potassium permanganate solution with a concentration of 0.01%, and then add activated carbon (activated carbon is submerged in the potassium permanganate solution) to the potassium permanganate solution, soak for 0.5-10 minutes, filter and dry, and then store it at a te...
Embodiment 2
[0081] The difference with embodiment 1 is that the flue gas components are as follows: O 2 20%, NO 10ppm, SO 2 5ppm for CO, 200ppm for CO, 5ppm for HC, and nitrogen for the rest. The flue gas temperature is 25 degrees Celsius, the relative humidity is 70%, and the pressure is 1 atmosphere.
[0082] After the treatment was completed, the air quality at the air outlet was measured. According to the calculation, the removal efficiency of NO was 100%, and the removal efficiency of SO was 100%. 2 The removal efficiency reaches 100%, the CO removal efficiency reaches over 70%, and the HC removal efficiency reaches 90%.
Embodiment 3
[0084] Compared with Example 1, the difference is that in step (2), the mass ratio of Pd to titanium oxide is 0.001:1.
[0085] After the treatment is completed, the removal efficiency of NO reaches 100%, SO 2 The removal efficiency reaches 100%, the CO removal efficiency reaches over 90%, and the HC removal efficiency reaches 100%.
PUM
| Property | Measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| wavelength | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| diameter | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| length | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


