Linear motor active disturbance rejection control design method based on Taylor tracking differentiator

A technology of tracking differentiator and active disturbance rejection control, which is applied in motor generator control, AC motor control, electronic commutation motor control, etc. It can solve the problems of the system being susceptible to interference and poor robustness, and improve the servo tracking accuracy , the effect of high tracking accuracy

Active Publication Date: 2021-01-08
中国人民解放军火箭军工程大学
4 Cites 0 Cited by

AI-Extracted Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

However, due to the lack of an intermediate mechanical connection device, the electromagnetic thrust of the lin...
the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Abstract

The invention discloses a linear motor active disturbance rejection control design method based on a Taylor tracking differentiator. Firstly, a Taylor tracking differentiator is designed by using feedback displacement information to estimate speed information, then a minimum-order extended state observer is designed by using the speed information to estimate interference on the linear motor, and aclosed-loop feedback controller selects PD control with feedforward compensation, so that limited bandwidth resources of the system are fully utilized, A system state and interference estimation scheme is reasonably designed, and the servo tracking precision of the linear motor is effectively improved.

Application Domain

Technology Topic

ServoActive disturbance rejection control +7

Image

  • Linear motor active disturbance rejection control design method based on Taylor tracking differentiator
  • Linear motor active disturbance rejection control design method based on Taylor tracking differentiator
  • Linear motor active disturbance rejection control design method based on Taylor tracking differentiator

Examples

  • Experimental program(1)

Example Embodiment

[0063]Examples:
[0064]In order to verify the feasibility of the active disturbance rejection control design method based on Taylor tracking differentiator provided by the present invention, thefigure 2 Verification in the linear motor control system shown:
[0065]Based on the control design method proposed in this article, the attachedfigure 2 The load of the linear motor system in the system is a weight with a total mass of 1.4kg, the mass of the linear motor mover is 1.79kg, the drive constant Ka=0.84A/V, the thrust coefficient is Km=15N/A, and then use them to separate them in sequence Substitute into formulas (1)-(6).
[0066]Comparing the design method of auto disturbance rejection control based on Taylor tracking differentiator provided by the present invention with the traditional auto disturbance rejection control design method, the controllers all use PD controllers with feedforward compensation, among which the linearity of traditional auto disturbance rejection controllers The expanded state observer is designed as follows:
[0067]
[0068]Among them, if ωoWhen a larger value is taken, it can be guaranteed that when t→∞,
[0069]Comprehensively considering the response speed and noise sensitivity of the system, the parameters of the Taylor tracking differentiator are set to: ε = 0.02, the RESO parameter is set to: r = 20, and the linear expansion state observer designed by formula (7) is set to: ωo=50, the PD controller parameter setting with feedforward compensation is: ωc= 30. The desired signal is: ξ(t)=0.2sin(2πf×t), f represents the frequency.
[0070]The sine signals of different frequencies are set, and the feasibility of the design method provided by the present invention is verified by comparing the tracking effect with the traditional active disturbance rejection control. f is set to the elements in the set {0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6} in turn. The experimental results are attachedFigure 3-4Shown. Withimage 3 Indicates the tracking error of the Taylor tracking differentiator-based ADRC and the traditional ADRC corresponding to the expected signals of different frequencies. Refer to the attachmentimage 3 It can be clearly seen that the accuracy of the auto disturbance rejection controller based on Taylor tracking differentiator is obviously better than that of the traditional auto disturbance rejection controller.
[0071]For a more precise descriptionimage 3 The tracking effect shown, define the root mean square error (RMSE): And calculate the attachedimage 3 The root mean square error of the Taylor tracking differentiator-based active disturbance rejection controller and the traditional active disturbance rejection controller corresponding to the different frequencies in theFigure 4 Shown.
[0072]Reference attachmentFigure 4 It can be seen that the root mean square of the tracking error of the active disturbance rejection controller based on the Taylor tracking differentiator at different frequencies is less than that of the traditional active disturbance rejection controller.
[0073]In summary, combined withimage 3 AndFigure 4 The experimental results can verify the feasibility of the active disturbance rejection controller based on Taylor tracking differentiator.
the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

PUM

no PUM

Description & Claims & Application Information

We can also present the details of the Description, Claims and Application information to help users get a comprehensive understanding of the technical details of the patent, such as background art, summary of invention, brief description of drawings, description of embodiments, and other original content. On the other hand, users can also determine the specific scope of protection of the technology through the list of claims; as well as understand the changes in the life cycle of the technology with the presentation of the patent timeline. Login to view more.
the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

Similar technology patents

Target positioning method, device and system

ActiveCN110133637AFast and precise positioningImprove tracking accuracyBeacon systems using electromagnetic wavesPosition fixationRadar measurementEnvironmental geology
Owner:CHANGCHUN INST OF OPTICS FINE MECHANICS & PHYSICS CHINESE ACAD OF SCI

Classification and recommendation of technical efficacy words

Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Try Eureka
PatSnap group products