Soil-piling flower box and greening structure adopting same

Abstract

The invention discloses a soil-piling flower box and a greening structure adopting the same. The soil-piling flower box comprises a box body and a water tank arranged at the bottom of the box body, the box body comprises a keel frame and a soil-piling layer fixed at the inner side of the keel frame, and a soil-piling net rack is arranged between the keel frame and the soil-piling layer; and a filling cavity is defined by the soil-piling layer and is divided into an upper filling area used for being filled with fertilizer-doped loose piled soil and a lower filling area used for being filled with ceramsite. The greening structure comprises a support and the soil-piling flower box. By means of the soil-piling flower box and the greening structure, the advantages of being good in water-retaining property, good in environmental protection property, free of water and soil loss, free of soil hardening, free of soil scattering, capable of achieving safety of plants in extremely hot and extremely cold weather, low in maintenance cost, good in plant growth effect, capable of achieving multi-face planting, good in heat preservation property, capable of avoiding the root entangling phenomenon,capable of reducing noise, insulating sound and absorbing sound and the like are achieved.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to the field of greening technology, in particular to a soil-filled flower box and a greening structure using the soil-built flower box. Background technique [0002] The existing greening on both sides of the road, the central isolation belt of the road, and the viaduct mainly include the bag type, planting tank, planting box, hydroponic type, climbing vine type, etc. These methods have more or less their own shortcomings. as follows: [0003] Bag type: poor water retention, poor environmental protection, serious soil erosion and soil compaction, high plant mortality, and high maintenance costs; [0004] Planting box / trough: Poor water retention, poor environmental protection, serious soil erosion and soil compaction, high plant necrosis rate in about 2 months, high maintenance cost; [0005] Hydroponics: the generated reclaimed water needs to be treated and the maintenance cost is high; [0006] Frame traction / climbing type: ...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0003] Bag type: poor water retention, poor environmental protection, serious soil erosion and soil compaction, high plant mortality, and high maintenance costs;

[0004] Planting box / trough: Poor water retention, poor environmental protection, serious soil erosion and soil compaction, high plant necrosis rate in about 2 months, high maintenance cost;

[0005] Hydroponics: the generated reclaimed water needs to be treated and the maintenance cost is high;

[0006] Frame traction / climbing type: poor water retention, serious soil erosion and soil compaction;

[0007] To sum up, there is currently no greening method that can simultaneously have the advantages of good water retention, good environmental protection, no soil erosion and soil compaction, low maintenance costs, and good plant growth effects

[0008] In addition, the existing greening methods also have the following disadvantages: 1. The planting surface is single, and it is impossible to realize multi-faceted and multi-dimensional planting, which in turn affects the greening area and greening effect; It is easy to die under low temperature conditions; 3. Plants grow too long and are prone to root packing

Images