While well understood and common in bridge building, the use of concrete slabs as a
deck presents tremendous weight loads on the primary structures of a bridge, such as the primary cables in a suspension bridge or counter-lever steel beams in a counter levered bridge.
However, the bridge
construction industry recognizes that OSD bridges have not been problem-free historically, and they present unique challenges in terms of design and construction as compared to conventional bridge construction.
Fatigue cracking has been observed more frequently in OSD systems resulting from the complicated weld demands combined with stresses that can be more difficult to quantify and, in particular, which were found in early designs which attempted to overly minimize plate thicknesses to reduce weight.
In addition, design loading is determined by live loading (moving vehicles) versus dead loading of the span which requires a precise loading
design strategy, and such cyclic live loading dominates the design because fatigue will be the controlling limit for a particular bridge design.
Early analytical tools were limited in their ability to quantify the stress states in these details and the early experimental
fatigue resistance database was limited.
Moreover, the fatigue performance of many of these details can be sensitive to fabrication techniques.
Unfortunately, many trials were unsuccessful, and reports of
cracking have occurred in re-decking projects where the interactions between new OSD and existing concrete structure were difficult to account for, and created questions among users especially in the United States as to the long-term effectiveness of OSD systems in the highway infrastructure.
The potential for
cracking at the rib-to-
deck plate weld is indicative of this problem.
Current designs typically are not standardized, and thus repetition does not currently help to improve construction and fabrication techniques, however many
welding strategies with respect to rib to
deck connection and other OSD elements have been refined over the years to ensure the proper distribution of stress across and to and from the decking.
However, a complication of the closed rib
system is in the execution of the one side partial penetration weld for the rib connection to the deck plate.
Also, due to its geometry and inherent
torsional strength, closed rib decks are subject to local secondary deformations and stresses that make them vulnerable to fatigue at the intersection at the rib to deck.
Furthermore, field splices of the ribs are also more complicated, and this system requires tolerance control in fabrication and erection to ensure proper fit at the splices.
Generally, partial penetration welds are avoided in bridge design and construction because, depending on the joint configuration, associated stiffness, and the applied stress, such welds can be a fatigue concern.
Further, over years of observation and
laboratory testing, welds joining rib legs to the underside of the decking plating are the most common area prone to
fatigue cracking due to plate deformation, which is caused by the active loading of vehicles moving over the deck surface.
In addition, testing and experience has shown that a penetration amount of less than 70% provides insufficient
weld strength, but a
weld penetration amount of greater than 80%, and especially 100%, may lead to
fatigue cracking initiated from the weld root when exposed to out-of-plane bending moments.
Additionally, while ultrasonic testing is useful for detecting weld defects and various systems are available for such testing, detecting the penetration of a weld using current ultrasonic testing systems is difficult and not optimized to detect the penetration percentage of welds in a rib to deck weld
scenario.
In particular, conventional ultrasonic systems (i.e. non-
phased array systems) do not have the
beam control and resolution to accurately measure the amount of penetration in a weld.
First, probes in conventional ultrasonic systems only offer fixed angles of beam profile, and the beam cannot be focused in a real-time analysis.
So, penetration height cannot be accurately determined in many instances.
Second, conventional ultrasonic systems do not allow a user to focus the beam to provide the necessary resolution to discern certain weld
anatomy elements that are required to calculate the penetration of the weld.
In addition, even with
phased array ultrasonic systems the time required to do a manual examination of a weld seam along a rib would be impractical.
However, each such manual examination would, if performed by a skilled operator would take 20-30 seconds for each slice.
Hence, even for a relatively short bridge of 1
mile, a manual inspection of weld penetrations on such a bridge even if the number of inspectors was increased would be impractical to the point of never being accomplished in any economically viable manner.
The result is that only imprecise sampling using
manual testing is currently done on OSD systems which leaves bridges with mostly untested rib to deck weld seams, the integrity of which is the most fatigue prone element in any bridge construction project.