Void-containing polyester shrink film with improved density retention
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Benefits of technology
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Examples
examples
[0053] General—Test methods followed standard ASTM procedures wherever possible. Film densities were obtained by immersing small pieces of the film (cut using a hole punch) in fluids of known density. The fluid density which caused the film sample to “hang” without sinking or floating was taken to be the film density. For densities from 0.80 g / cc to 1 g / cc, these fluids were produced from blends of ethanol and water and calibrated against a hydrometer. For densities above 1 g / cc, the control fluids were blended in a similar manner using salt and water.
[0054] General film quality and aesthetics were based on subjective evaluation and are shown in Table II. An excellent film was one with uniform dispersion of voids / additives, high opacity, no high / low spots, good strength, and no streaking from poor mixing. Film tactile qualities (i.e. “hand”) were also included with stiff, noisy films being rated more poorly, and softer “low-noise” films being preferred. Poor films generally exhibit...
examples 1-8
Annealing Experiments
[0062] Films in this example were made in the same manner as Comparative Examples 1-7; however, stretching conditions were varied to try and balance the post-wash density with shrinkage. It was found that annealing temperatures in the vicinity 100° C. worked best. Samples containing lower levels of concentrate (e.g., Examples 1 and 2) had the narrowest processing window, but were also the toughest and least likely to tear. Stretch ratios had to be run higher on these films to get the most possible voiding (they were also less likely to tear during the stretching process than films with higher levels of concentrate).
[0063] Increasing the level of concentrate to 30% (Examples 6-8) resulted in a film with excellent shrinkage and low density under a very wide range of processing conditions. However, the film was also more prone to tearing because of the high level of voiding. Although this film would be acceptable for many applications, it is less preferred for pa...
example 9
Curve Fitting and Optimization of Trial Data
[0064] The data from Examples 1-8 and Comparative Examples 1-7 were statistically fit to an equation to better understand trends and interactions (included in this analysis was other trial data on the same tenter frame not reported above). The variables in the model were stretch ratio, average stretch temperature (i.e. the average of preheat and stretch temperature), % clip retraction, anneal temperature, and % concentrate. The responses to be predicted were 5 seconds shrink at 95° C. and density after 15 minutes at 85° C. Analysis and optimization was performed using JMP™ statistical analysis software and a linear model fit.
[0065] Optimization was performed in order to find the best combination of conditions that would yield high shrinkage (>60%) and a density less than 1.05 g / cc after the 85° C. wash. Constraints to the optimization were that the concentrate level had to be less than 30 wt % to minimize brittleness, and the stretch con...
PUM
Property | Measurement | Unit |
---|---|---|
Temperature | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Temperature | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Temperature | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
- R&D Engineer
- R&D Manager
- IP Professional
- Industry Leading Data Capabilities
- Powerful AI technology
- Patent DNA Extraction
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.
© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com