One problem with the socket type tools is that they are designed to catch only on specific shaped items and therefore are limited in the types of items with which they can
interlock.
This often results in the several different sizes of sockets having to be run into the well before the proper socket size can be found.
This is expensive in terms of time and manpower to try again and again to get the proper socket size for the specific situation.
Furthermore the sockets have a tendency of slipping open when hardened, hard lined,
brass, out of round or worn couplings are being fished.
Lastly, the sockets generally last for only one or two uses and become worn easily.
One problem with the biter type tools is that they are attempting to bite into a hard surface and therefore can slip.
Furthermore the teeth on the slips generally only last for one or two uses before becoming worn off.
Also, the tool is limited on the sizes of rods it can catch, limited on where it can catch the rod.
The tool can become wedged and therefore limits the amount of pressure that this tool can exert when pulling an item from a well.
The prior art mousetrap tools have several problems.
First, because this type of tool is welded together, the barrel of this type of tool is weak and cannot withstand large lateral strains such as those imposed on it when the slip and the item being pulled are wedge between the walls of the barrel.
Also, the top of this type of tool is also welded to the barrel portion and this creates another weak area where the tool will break.
A further problem with this type of tool is that the side opening provided in the barrel of the tool is located above the shoulder of the slip, causing the item to create a sideways pull and torque moment on the tool as the item is pulled.
This torque moment imposes stress on the tool that causes the barrel of the tool to split open and fail.
Still a further problem with this tool is that it cannot be made in the sizes that are needed in the field.
The geometry of the tool makes the walls too thin to hold the weight and tension of the rod string being pulled from the well.
A further problem with the tool is the way in which the slip is retained within the barrel of the tool.
The problem with these shoulders is that they can become bent and can prevent the slip from moving up and down within the barrel of the tool.
When this happens, the tool is unable to attach to a rod and cannot fish rod out of the well.
Because the shoulders of prior art tools are either welded within the tool or formed as an integral part of the barrel of the tool, once they become damaged, they cannot be economically repaired or replaced.
This results in the tool no longer being functional and the tool must then be discarded.
Still a further problem with prior art fishing tools is that because their body is a
fixed length and their bodies cannot be lengthened, they are unable to catch certain types of breaks, such as rod breaks where the broken length of rod exceeds the length of the body of the fishing tool, thus making it impossible for the fishing tool to be lowered sufficiently around the broken rod for the fishing tool to engage one of the protrusions on the well string which can be gripped by the slip of the fishing tool.
There are no tools within the industry today that can catch fiberglass sucker rods or successfully catch polished rods that break in the body.
Fiberglass sucker rods will simply tear if biter type tools are used and also sometimes fiberglass rods will
flare out slightly at the end of the break, making it difficult for the rod body to fit into a biter type tool.
Therefore they are hardened to prevent wear which makes them very difficult to fish with biter type tools.
Because of all these weaknesses in this tool, it generally will only be a
single use tool and it can only pull approximately 5,000 pounds of force without breaking.
Further, this tool will catch hard lined couplings, fiberglass, worn or out of round couplings.