Cardiac CT system and method for planning and treatment of biventricular pacing using epicardial lead

Abstract

A method for planning biventricular pacing lead placement for a patient includes obtaining acquisition data from a medical imaging system and generating a 3D model of the left ventricle and thoracic wall of the patient. One or more left ventricle anatomical landmarks are identified on the 3D model, and saved views of the 3D model are registered on an interventional system. One or more of the registered saved views are visualized with the interventional system, and at least one suitable region on the left ventricle wall is identified for epicardial lead placement.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0001]The present disclosure relates generally to cardiac rhythm management systems and, more particularly, to a cardiac imaging system and method for planning biventricular pacing using an epicardial lead.[0002]It is estimated that approximately 6-7 million people in the United States and Europe alone have congestive heart failure (CHF), with ischemic and idiopathic cardiomyopathies being the most common causes of CHF. In about 20-50% of patients having CHF, the associated electrocardiograms are characterized by prolonged PR intervals and wide QRS complexes. Moreover, about 29% of these patients have left bundle branch block (LBBB).[0003]In a normal heartbeat, the electrical conduction begins in the sinoatrial (SA) node (a small group of muscle cells in the upper right part of the upper right heart chamber, i.e., the right atrium). Impulses sent out by the SA node spread quickly throughout the upper heart chamber and across the atrioventricular (AV) node....

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

However, in those patients with CHF and LBBB, a long mechanical delay in the left side of the heart leads to a delayed left ventricular ejection due to delayed left ventricular depolarization.

In addition, this condition may also result in different regions of the left ventricle not contracting in a coordinated fashion.

Subsequently, the lateral wall then shortens and the septum stretches, thereby causing an ineffective contraction of the left ventricle.

However, in over 20% of these patients, lead placement in the CS may be an unsuccessful or very lengthy procedure, or the lead may become dislodged from the CS.

Other difficulties with this lead placement procedure may also include unavailability of a suitable CS branch, significant rotation of the CS due to left atrium and left ventricle dilation, and the presence of the Tebesian valve therein.

In most instances, these problems are identified only at the time of the interventional procedure, and thus the procedure is typically either completely abandoned or the patient is brought back into the operating room for a second procedure where, through the use of a surgical incision, an expensive and invasive procedure, the left ventricle lead is placed epicardially.

Unfortunately, epicardial lead placement is not without its own pitfalls, some of which include: a limited view of the posterolateral area of the left ventricle using minithoracotomy; the limitation of placement sites providing reasonable pacing and sensing parameters; the inability to determine the distance of the left ventricle from the thoracic wall; the inability to identify the posterolateral area of the left ventricle that contracts last; the potential risk of damaging the coronary arteries and veins; the increased level of difficulty due to the presence of extrapericardial fat; the lack of visualization of normal versus scarred tissue; and the difficulty in identifying the ideal pacing position as a result of one or more of the above.

Images