Mouse automated testing equipment and method

Abstract

The invention discloses automatic mouse testing equipment and an automatic mouse testing method. The testing equipment comprises a roller function testing mechanism; a common key testing mechanism comprises a third driving mechanism and a knocking mechanism; and the third driving mechanism drives the knocking mechanism to knock a left key, a middle key and a right key of the mouse, so that functions of the keys of the mouse are tested. The third driving mechanism is a third cylinder; the knocking mechanism comprises a first small cylinder, a second small cylinder and a third small cylinder; and the common key testing mechanism also comprises a third sliding block. Moreover, the testing equipment also comprises a control center, a roller function testing mechanism and a linear function testing mechanism; and the control center is respectively connected to the various testing mechanisms. By using the automatic mouse testing equipment and the automatic mouse testing method, fatigue of eyes of a user can be reduced, uniformity of testing judgment standards is kept, faulty operation on classification of products is stopped absolutely (namely defective products cannot be mixed in good products), testing time is shortened, the productivity in unit time is improved, and the labor cost is reduced.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention belongs to the technical field of mouse testing, and relates to a mouse testing equipment, in particular to a mouse automatic testing equipment; meanwhile, the invention also relates to a mouse automatic testing method. Background technique [0002] The mouse is one of the inseparable input devices in the entire calculator system. During the production process of the mouse, the assembled mouse must pass a function test before it can be packed into the warehouse. [0003] Usually, the test of the mouse includes the test of the button (action, continuous key), linear function (whether the movement is smooth, whether the positioning is accurate), and the wheel (whether it moves, tabs, or leaks) test; [0004] In general factory production testing, manual testing is used. This method has several disadvantages: [0005] (1) The quality of the product is judged by the experience of the tester, and different testers will have different judgment...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0005] (1) The quality of the product is judged by the experience of the tester, and different testers will have different judgments on the same mouse;

[0006] (2) During the test, testers need to pay attention to the computer screen all the time, observe the response of the corresponding program during the test, and the eyes are very tired;

[0007] (3) In a large number of repetitive tests every day, misoperation may occur in the handling of the tested mouse (sometimes it is easy to send defective products to the next station as good products);

[0008] (4) Some key parameters cannot be tested (such as current, resolution);

[0009] (5) The statistics of the test results every day are manually counted, which is prone to omission and misrecording;

[0010] (6) At the front and back stations of the test station, there are two manual pick-and-place actions, which wastes man-hours, low output, and high labor costs;

[0011] (7) Even if some factories have added machine testing, they still need manual intervention for many times during the testing process, and the degree of automation is not high

Images