Processed food containing raw red fish meat containing myoglobin and manufacturing method thereof
A technology for processed food and myoglobin, which is applied in the field of processed food containing myoglobin for raw edible red fish and its manufacture, and can solve problems such as uncolored research and the like
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0060] The frozen bigeye tuna flesh with the head, tail and viscera removed is divided into four pieces along its spine, and then cut into 15cm-20cm blocks. After making the block into a semi-thawed state, 100 g of vegetable oil, 8 g of trisodium phosphate, 0.23 g of ascorbic acid, and 50 g of water were added per 1 kg, and they were mixed using a chopping machine (SC20-N manufactured by Yanagiya Co., Ltd.). Finely cut. The time for the fine cutting process was set to 45 seconds.
[0061] The processed food thus obtained is vacuum-packed in a packaging material. The packaging material has an oxygen transmission rate of 5cc / (m 2 ・24 hours・atmospheric pressure) is composed of a resin film with a 2-layer structure. The outer layer of the resin film of this two-layer structure is KON (15 micrometers), and the inner layer is LLDPE (50 micrometers). When performing vacuum packaging, set the vacuum degree to 700mmHg.
[0062] The vacuum-packed processed food was immediately froz...
Embodiment 2 and 3 and comparative example 1~3
[0064] Processed foods were obtained in the same manner as in Example 1, except that the time for finely chopping was changed to the values shown in Table 2. The same measurement as in Example 1 was performed on this processed food. The results are shown in Table 2.
[0065] 〔Overview〕
[0066] A panel of 12 people performed comprehensive sensory evaluation on the processed foods obtained in Examples and Comparative Examples. The evaluation items were visually red, the size of the grains, and the uniformity of the grains. In the evaluation, using the quantitative descriptive analysis method (QDA method), let each group give a score between 0 (worst) and 100 (best) for redness, grain size, and grain uniformity. Find the average of the scores. For red, 30 or more was judged to be good, and less than 30 was judged to be poor. Regarding the grain size, 20 to 30 were judged as good, and those outside this range were judged as poor. Regarding the uniformity of grains, 35 or ...
PUM
Login to View More Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 

