Unlock instant, AI-driven research and patent intelligence for your innovation.

Container with interference projection

a technology of container and projection, applied in the field of new containers, can solve the problems of water being generally economically impossible to remove, the water being carried under the container, and the product quality reducing,

Inactive Publication Date: 2002-09-12
PHOENIX CLOSURES
View PDF0 Cites 3 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0011] In accordance with the present invention, a container and closure are provided. The container is provided with a mouth (which may or may not be lined or otherwise sealed) and a neck portion having closure engagements for cooperation with complimentary container engagements on the closure. An annular projection is provided, extending outwardly from the neck portion of the container, below the closure engagements. The outward most edge of the annular projection is proximate to the inner wall of the closure when the closure is engaged on the container. The annular projection in cooperation with the closure prevents fluids, dust particles or other contaminants from splashing up onto the neck, mouth and (if present) liner of the container when the container and closure are engaged and are exposed to splashable substances or are cooled by spray or immersion after hot fill.
[0013] In another embodiment of the invention, the annular projection is molded between two inward annular projections, which provide flex points for the outward projection. The flex points, thus formed, allow the outward projection to bend so that it may fit within the closure and to allow for more tolerance in molding containers and closures.

Problems solved by technology

The hot fill process in most bottling situations brings certain problems that are inherent in this method of filling and cooling.
Generally, while the process is sanitary, the subsequent activities of cooling and packaging may bring about a situation wherein such bottles carry water beneath their caps.
This water is generally a potential breeding ground for bacteria which may grow thereon, and cause a diminution in product quality.
Such water is generally economically impossible to remove, as the drying of that water would require either the removal of the cap (typically causing the breaking of a sanitary or security seal) and physical drying of the bottle, followed by recapping, or the use of high heat drying equipment, which may cause deformation in the bottle and cap or degradation of the bottled product.
Further, containers of such products, and other products, are subjected to considerable jostling in every stage of their existence.
Even after a container is unsealed and put into everyday use the container is subjected to every manner of assault on its integrity.
While a container generally survives jostling, the product inside, and / or the seals or liners used to protect the product are often imparted with considerable splashing or dusting from their surroundings, so as to leave the liner or, when the seal is removed or otherwise impaired, the product adulterated, contaminated or soiled beyond usability.
Products such as medicine and food or drink that are bottled and capped under sanitary conditions are often times quickly contaminated by the splashing of liquid or powder (often times the same substance that has been placed in the container, but which has spilled during filling or from other containers previously filled, or overfilled).
While containers may be wiped clean if such splash up occurs prior to the capping and or the sealing of the container, once the container is capped and / or sealed (with a liner or otherwise), splash up that causes adulterating substances to rise to the neck or mouth of the capped container cannot be cleaned up without great cost in time and lost production.
Further, the removal of the cap of a tamper resistant or tamper evident container of the types in common use, so as to clean off splash up, is likely to destroy the tamper evident seal causing the loss of the container and / or the closure.
Further, capped products may also be contaminated, in this same manner or through contamination by any other substance on or around the container, during transportation, either from the manufacturer to the distributor, or from the distributor to the product's final destination.
Closed containers may also be contaminated at anytime during the life of the product and the container.
For example, a bottle of milk may be contaminated by the splash up of spilled milk, water, or cleaning products on the assembly line, may be contaminated by the splash up of liquid condensation (which may form on the bottle as a result of temperature changes during transit), or may be dropped into the sink, or onto any splashable substance, while the consumer is attempting to open or after closing the container.
In all of these situations, and particularly in those situations where liners have already been removed from the container, the product is likely to be ruined by the splashing of any substance under the cap, onto the neck, and into the mouth of the container.
Further, even when a liner exists over the container's mouth, a consumer is apt to be displeased and return the sealed products if he finds that the liner is wet or dirty upon opening the container for the first time.
While the liner may have prevented the product inside the container from having been contaminated, the proximity of a contaminant to the neck and mouth of a container may lead, at a later time, to contamination of the product via the consumer's hands or by other means.
However, such protection is generally effective only after the likelihood of splash up during the container filling process on the assembly line has passed and is only useful until the plastic film is removed by the consumer prior to use.
However, such container and closure combinations only seal the mouth of the container and do not protect the neck of the container.
Liner-less closures cannot prevent the contamination of the neck of the container and the concomitant problems of product contamination from the soiling of the consumer's hands after contact with an unclean container neck.
Further, liner-less closures cannot prevent the migration of the contaminant from the container neck to the container mouth (and subsequently to the product inside the container).

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Container with interference projection
  • Container with interference projection
  • Container with interference projection

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

Embodiment Construction

[0029] Referring to the drawings, FIG. 1 shows a container 10 having a neck 12 a mouth 16 and an outwardly projecting helical thread 18. Helical thread 18 provides a means to engage a closure 20 (FIG. 3) having inwardly projecting helical threads 22, in a manner well known in the art. In the illustrative embodiments of the present invention, the container and its constituent parts have been produced through a molding process, it is to be understood, however, that the present invention may be used on containers made in any manner without departing from the novel scope of the present invention. Container 10 may be constructed of any material, including, glass, metal or any polymeric or plastic material such as polypropylene, polyethylene, polyethyleneterephthalate (PET), polystyrene, or others, without departing from the novel scope of the present invention. It is to be further understood that while a single helical thread is shown in FIG. 1, any number and shape of threads, on both t...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

No PUM Login to View More

Abstract

A closure and container combination having an anti-splash up element is provided. The container includes an annular projection about the neck of the container at a point below the closure-engagements and within the closure skirt, when the closure is engaged. The placement of the annular projection stops the splashing up of liquid and solid adulterating materials from reaching the mouth of the container and either the liner on the mouth of the container or the actual product within the container. The annular projection of the present invention protects the product from splash up occurring after container capping, during hot fill cooling and washing, during transportation and storage and while in use by the consumer.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION[0001] The present invention concerns a novel container having an interference projection to prevent water, dust or other adulterating material from reaching the mouth area of the container. Specifically, the present invention provides a means to prevent cooling water or condensation, typically resulting from a hot fill process, from being splashed beneath a bottle cap.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0002] Many products, such as pasteurized milk and fruit juices and others, are placed into bottles using a sanitary hot fill process which requires that the bottles be sealed, capped and cooled before being boxed and packaged for transportation. The hot fill process in most bottling situations brings certain problems that are inherent in this method of filling and cooling. Generally, while the process is sanitary, the subsequent activities of cooling and packaging may bring about a situation wherein such bottles carry water beneath their caps. This water is generally a...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): B65D1/02
CPCB65D1/023B65D2501/0036
Inventor EKKERT, LEN
Owner PHOENIX CLOSURES