Subterranean fluids and methods of using these fluids in subterranean formations
a technology of fluids and subterranean formations, applied in the field of subterranean fluids, can solve the problems of increasing the gel strength of drilling fluid, increasing the difficulty of drilling fluid in the well bore, and operator's inability to displace all drilling fluid with cement composition
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Benefits of technology
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Examples
example 1
[0028] Rheological testing was performed on sample of various fluids, in order to compare the compatibility of the well fluids of the present invention with oil-based drilling fluids. The testing was performed at 140° F. per API Recommended Practice 10B.
[0029] Sample Composition No. 1 is a well fluid of the present invention, and was prepared by first adding 12 grams of a Tallow di-amine substituted with 3 moles of ethylene oxide to 108 grams of a C11-C15 saturated hydrocarbon oil. Then, 90 grams of water were added at low shear. The resulting mixture was then sheared at 12,000 rpm for 2 minutes on a Waring blender to form an oil external emulsion. Next, 350 grams of Portland Class A cement, 3 grams of HR-15 cement retarder, and 2.16 grams of an organophilic clay were added to form the oil external cement slurry that comprises Sample Composition No. 1.
[0030] Sample Composition No. 2 comprises 75% of an invert emulsion drilling fluid and 25% of a well fluid of the present invention...
example 2
[0038] Static gel strength testing was conducted on well fluids of the present invention. A fluid was prepared comprising 108 grams of ESCAID 110™ oil, 12 grams of surfactant comprising a Tallow di-amine substituted with 3 moles of ethylene oxide, 135 grams of water, 250 grams Class A cement, and 2.16 grams CLAYTONE II oil viscosifier. Sample Compositions were prepared from this fluid by adding varying amounts of HR®-5 set retarder.
[0039] Sample Composition No. 8 comprises the fluid plus 0.6% HR®-5 by weight of cement.
[0040] Sample Composition No. 9 comprises the fluid plus 0.7% HR®-5 by weight of cement.
[0041] Sample Composition No. 10 comprises the fluid plus 0.8% HR®-5 by weight of cement.
[0042] Sample Composition No. 11 comprises the fluid plus 0.9% HR®-5 by weight of cement.
[0043] Static gel strength testing was performed at 140° F. per API Recommended Practice 13 B-2 (2d. ed., Dec. 1, 1991). The results are set forth in the table below.
TABLE 2Static Gel StrengthSetDevel...
example 3
[0045] An additional portion of Sample Composition No. 10 was formulated and subjected to static gel strength testing at 160° F. per API Recommended Practice 13 B-2 (2d. ed., Dec. 1, 1991). The results are set forth in the table below.
TABLE 3Static Gel Strength DevelopmentSetSet(lb / 100 ft2)TimeStrengthSample FluidDay 1Day 2Day 3Day 4(days)(psi)Sample3745NDND3-442CompositionNo. 10
[0046] In the above table, “ND” means that a value was not determined for a particular sample on the day indicated. The above example demonstrates, inter alia, that the well fluids of the present invention maintain a low static gel strength prior to developing compressive strength.
PUM
| Property | Measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| density | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| temperatures | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| period of time | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More