Mouse testing equipment and testing method thereof

Abstract

The invention discloses mouse testing equipment and a testing method thereof. The mouse testing equipment comprises a control center, an idler wheel function testing mechanism, a linear function testing mechanism and a common key testing mechanism; the idler wheel function testing mechanism comprises a first driving mechanism and a first rolling mechanism; the first rolling mechanism is driven to operate by virtue of the first driving mechanism; the first rolling mechanism is used for driving an idler wheel of a to-be-tested mouse to rotate by virtue of a frictional force; the linear function testing mechanism comprises a second driving mechanism and a second rolling mechanism; the second driving mechanism is positioned at the bottom of the to-be-tested mouse; the second driving mechanism is used for driving the second rolling mechanism to rotate, relative movement between a desktop and the mouse is simulated, and the linear function of the mouse is tested; the common key testing mechanism comprises a third driving mechanism and a knocking mechanism; the third driving mechanism is used for driving the knocking mechanism to knock the left, middle and right keys of the mouse so as to perform function test on each key of the mouse. The mouse testing equipment disclosed by the invention is free from manual intervention, and can be used for improving the testing efficiency and lowering the labor cost.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention belongs to the technical field of mouse testing, and relates to a mouse testing device, in particular to a fully automatic mouse function testing device; at the same time, the invention also relates to a mouse function fully automatic testing method. Background technique [0002] The mouse is one of the inseparable input devices in the entire calculator system. During the production process of the mouse, the assembled mouse must pass a function test before it can be packed into the warehouse. [0003] Usually, the test of the mouse includes the test of the button (action, continuous key), linear function (whether the movement is smooth, whether the positioning is accurate), and the wheel (whether it moves, tabs, or leaks) test; [0004] In general factory production testing, manual testing is used. This method has several disadvantages: [0005] (1) The quality of the product is judged by the experience of the tester, and different teste...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0005] (1) The quality of the product is judged by the experience of the tester, and different testers will have different judgments on the same mouse;

[0006] (2) During the test, testers need to pay attention to the computer screen all the time, observe the response of the corresponding program during the test, and the eyes are very tired;

[0007] (3) In a large number of repetitive tests every day, misoperation may occur in the handling of the tested mouse (sometimes it is easy to send defective products to the next station as good products);

[0008] (4) Some key parameters cannot be tested (such as current, resolution);

[0009] (5) The statistics of the test results every day are manually counted, which is prone to omission and misrecording;

[0010] (6) At the front and back stations of the test station, there are two manual pick-and-place actions, which wastes man-hours, low output, and high labor costs;

[0011] (7) Even if some factories have added machine testing, they still need manual intervention for many times during the testing process, and the degree of automation is not high

Images