City design paperless intelligent interaction review method based on solid model

Abstract

The invention discloses a city design paperless intelligent interaction review method based on a solid model. The method comprises the steps of basic data integration and digital sand table construction, digital library construction of urban design review, urban design result data input and identification, urban design result intelligent review and label generation, review result report generationand interactive feedback, and automatic updating of the digital sand table. On the basis of actual measurement of the status quo and model correction, digital library building is performed on urban design review key points according to a digital sand table so that intelligent interactive review of urban design results can be realized. According to the invention, all management and control key points in legal planning and specification standards can be extracted, intelligent interactive examination covering all key points is carried out on urban design results through intelligent embedding ofintelligent codes and a three-dimensional digital sand table, and paperless generation of examination results and omnibearing display in a real three-dimensional space scene are realized.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention belongs to the field of urban planning and relates to an urban design review method, in particular to a paperless intelligent interactive review method for urban design based on a solid model. Background technique [0002] Urban design review is one of the common business processes of the urban planning management department. The business personnel check whether the various indicators of the urban design plan of the land meet the requirements by comparing the statutory planning and the control points of the normative standards, and issue a review report. However, with the rapid and stable development of the urbanization process, the update iteration frequency and the number of statutory planning and normative standards are increasing day by day, and the massive control points lead to frequent occurrence of manual review results "missing all" and "contradictory". The urban designer The review work has increased the difficulty and time cost...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

However, with the rapid and stable development of the urbanization process, the update iteration frequency and the number of statutory planning and normative standards are increasing day by day, and the massive control points lead to frequent occurrence of manual review results "missing all" and "contradictory". The urban designer Review work, increasing the difficulty and time cost of urban design review

On the other hand, the traditional urban design results review can only calculate various indicators through two-dimensional drawings such as CAD or low-precision block models constructed by SketchUp, which leads to obvious deviations between the indicator results and the real three-dimensional space of the city, making it difficult to guarantee the review Authenticity and validity of results

At the same time, urban design results cannot be displayed in all directions in the real three-dimensional space of the city, and the construction effect can only be simulated through indirect means such as renderings, which can easily mislead business personnel and cover up real problems

[0003] Currently common urban design review methods, one is to manually search for the management and control points in the statutory planning and normative standards, and calculate various indicators based on the two-dimensional drawings or low-precision block models provided by the urban design results, which are the same as the management and control points After a comparison, the review results are given. This method has many problems such as large investment in manpower and material resources, long review time, easy omission of review points, and difficulty in ensuring the authenticity of the review results. Construct control boxes (such as height boxes, building setback boxes) with some of the control points in the normative standards, and review them through the collision of the block model of the urban design results. The review of distance points cannot review most of the control points that require spatial calculations, so it cannot be applied to real planning and management work, and it cannot be fully displayed and assisted in urban design review in the real three-dimensional space scene of the city

Images