Deinking system for carbonate pulping
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Benefits of technology
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
example 1
[0026] The criticality of surfactant and fatty acids to a successful deinking process for a carbonate pulping operation can be seen in the following comparison of two commercial plant trials, one a success and one a failure because it did not produce any improvement in deinking. The chemical additives used and the deinking results are shown below in Tables 1 and 2.
TABLE 1Successful TrialBase-Inven-Unsuccessful TriallinetionBaselineFailureSodium Hydroxide0.80—0.80-1.05—Sodium Silicate0.600.620.60-0.80 0.25-2.00Sodium Carbonate—0.30— 0.05-1.00Sodium Sulfite—0.10— 0.125-1.95Hydrogen Peroxide0.90—0.90—Chelant0.200.200.20—Fatty acid salts0.040.300.04 0.04-0.053Surfactant,0.16—0.12-0.16 0.05-0.25Cloud point 46-50° C.Cloud point 66-68° C.—0.03——Sodium Hydrosulfite0.150.150.150.15
[0027]
TABLE 2Successful TrialUnsuccessful TrialBaselineInventionBaselineFailureBrightness Gain (ISO)15.015.215.612.8% Efficiency76.880.575.267.3(Ink Removal)Hyper-wash Brightness52.954.252.552.2Hyper-was...
example 2
[0031] Laboratory testing of various systems was performed to compare a number of variables—fatty acids both individual and in combinations at varying levels. The testing was conducted using a Voith, 30 liter lab cell because it had previously been found to have a good correlation to actual mill performance. All mill materials, like furnish, mill water and mill chemicals were used to benchmark the cell against actual plant performance. Further optimization studies were conducted in both the lab and mill environment using this benchmark as a reference point.
[0032] The results of varying the fatty acids are shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. The fatty acid screening runs were conducted at low surfactant doses i.e., <10.00% of the total combined FA / surfactant dose. The surfactant was used essentially as a hydrotrope to generate reliable data (at the same level of rejects) with no rejects / foam surging due to furnish changes. The results show a substantial advantage of hydrogenated / hard fatty acid...
example 3
[0037] Hyper-wash testing was performed at multiple commercial mills to compare the benefits of the present invention (carbonate pulping plus deinking technology) vs. conventional sodium hydroxide technology. The results are shown below in Table 4 in which “Ponderay” is Ponderay Newsprint of Washington, “ARN” is Alabama River Newsprint, of Alabama, and “Augusta” is Augusta Newsprint of Georgia.
TABLE 4PULPER RESPONSEONP / OMGBrightness,ERICMillRatioHydroxideCarbonate% ISOppmPonderay80 / 20yesno51.0270Ponderay80 / 20noyes49.5270ARN95 / 5 yesno52.4260ARN95 / 5 noyes51.0240Augusta80 / 20yesno50.5168Augusta80 / 20noyes53.2178
PUM
| Property | Measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| Percent by mass | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| Percent by mass | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 

