As sanitary landfills continue to grow higher in elevation, and as surrounding areas continue to be developed, landfill operators are facing increasing problems with blowing litter.
Blowing litter causes complaints from neighbors, citations from regulatory agencies, and labor cost to clean it up.
However, extreme winds, or any winds during a lapse in these precautions, can cause litter transport far beyond landfill boundaries.
However this fencing is only partially effective.
The fencing is stationary and cannot be moved to adjust to changing site and wind conditions.
However they have several common deficiencies that impair their performance and utility:
They lack provisions for readily moving them to the most appropriate location to adjust to changing site and wind conditions, in time to be effective.
Barriers on skids or trucks are difficult and time-consuming to pull or push across unstable ground without sticking or damage.
Tires become punctured and flattened when rolled over refuse.
This is undesirable in areas of treacherous ground or during inclement weather.
Lifting bales are not adjustable and can only accommodate one particular
machine.
Because of these difficulties the barriers typically stay in one place even as the waste face constantly moves throughout the life of the landfill and as wind conditions change.
Therefore they are seldom positioned in the most appropriate location to effectively control litter.
They are not suitable for positioning close to, or within, the active waste face that is the source of the litter.
They sink into unstable refuse or ground, get stuck, or tip over.
They are difficult to remove or right without damage.
Their screens have catches, pinch points, and obstructions that tend to trap litter against the screen, even after the wind has subsided.
This “blinding” is unsightly, reduces effectiveness of the barriers, and increases wind loads, making the barriers prone to tipping.
Plastic construction fencing is prone to wind buffeting and resulting
premature failure.
Their designs do not consider the full loading of high winds and they are therefore prone to tipping.
They are difficult to position end-to-end with the result of allowing gaps in coverage.
Consequently litter blows through, between the ends of multiple barriers.
They are not matched in scale to the heavy machinery with which they are used.
They are often frail structures in comparison to these machines, difficult to see and easy to damage.
They have no provisions for convenient disassembly and reassembly that would be necessary, because of their
large size, to ship them to or from landfill sites.
Consequently they must be custom-fabricated on-site, generally under inadequate conditions to produce effective barriers at reasonable cost.
However, the aforementioned deficiencies impair their performance and utility to the point where they are not very effective.
Ineffective litter control is a liability to the landfill operator in the form of neighbor complaints, regulatory citations, and clean-up costs.
As public awareness of air quality continues to increase, and as governments respond with stricter laws and regulations, suspension and transport of airborne contaminants is an increasing problem for earthwork, landfill, and
surface mining operations.
However they have some deficiencies that impair their performance and utility:
Because of their aerodynamic
opacity they are prone to high wind loads, often resulting in damage, tipping, and failure.
They are not suitable for positioning close to, or within, the active face that is the source of the airborne contaminants.
They are not mobile and therefore cannot adjust to changing site and wind conditions.
Although they reduce suspension and transport of airborne contaminants, such suspension and transport remains a significant problem.
However, the aforementioned deficiencies, particularly their lack of mobility, impair their performance and utility to the point where they are not very effective.
Ineffective control of airborne contaminants is a liability to these operations in the form of neighbor complaints and regulatory citations.
There are several disadvantages to known misting systems.
Frequently mist applied in
open air operations is blown away by wind before it has beneficial effect, and it is difficult to retain the mist where it is needed.
There are also problems with autonomy and mobility of known misting systems.
Known systems usually rely on external power and water and are not suited to moving around a landfill, for example, on a daily basis.
Lastly, most commercially available systems lack convenient operational control and are prone to excessive
water consumption and accumulation on the ground.