Aza-quinolinol phosphonate integrase inhibitor compounds

Abstract

Aza-quinolinol phosphonate compounds and methods for inhibition of HIV-integrase are disclosed. Formula (I). Ar is aryl or heteroaryl connecting R6 to L. L is a bond or a linker connecting a ring atom of Ar to N. The ring atoms, X1-X5 may be N, substituted nitrogen, or substituted carbon, and form rings. The compounds include at least one phosphonate group covalently attached at any site.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION [0001] The invention relates generally to compounds with antiviral activity and more specifically with HIV-integrase inhibitory properties. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0002] Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and related diseases are a major public health problem worldwide. A virally encoded integrase protein mediates specific incorporation and integration of viral DNA into the host genome. Integration is essential for viral replication. Accordingly, inhibition of HIV integrase is an important therapeutic pursuit for treatment of HIV infection and related diseases. [0003] Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) encodes three enzymes which are required for viral replication: reverse transcriptase, protease, and integrase. Although drugs targeting reverse transcriptase and protease are in wide use and have shown effectiveness, particularly when employed in combination, toxicity and development of resistant strains have limited their usefulness (Pa...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

The aza-quinolinol phosphonate compounds demonstrate improved inhibitory potency against HIV integrase, increased bioavailability, and enhanced resistance to metabolic degradation, effectively inhibiting HIV growth and integration into host DNA, thus offering a more effective therapeutic option.

Problems solved by technology

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and related diseases are a major public health problem worldwide.

Although drugs targeting reverse transcriptase and protease are in wide use and have shown effectiveness, particularly when employed in combination, toxicity and development of resistant strains have limited their usefulness (Palella, etal N. Engl. J Med.

Although numerous agents potently inhibit 3′-P and ST in extracellular assays that employ recombinant integrase and viral long-terminal-repeat oligonucleotide sequences, often such inhibitors lack inhibitory potency when assayed using fully assembled preintegration complexes or fail to show antiviral effects against HIV-infected cells (Pommier, etal Adv.

Though many attempts have been made to develop effective methods for importing biologically active molecules into cells, both in vivo and in vitro, none has proved to be entirely satisfactory.

Optimizing the association of the inhibitory drug with its intracellular target, while minimizing intercellular redistribution of the drug, e.g. to neighboring cells, is often-difficult or inefficient.

Most agents currently administered to a patient parenterally are not targeted, resulting in systemic delivery of the agent to cells and tissues of the body where it is unnecessary, and often undesirable.

This may result in adverse drug side effects, and often limits the dose of a drug (e.g., cytotoxic agents and other anti-cancer or anti-viral drugs) that can be administered.

By comparison, although oral administration of drugs is generally recognized as a convenient and economical method of administration, oral administration can result in either (a) uptake of the drug through the cellular and tissue barriers, e.g. blood / brain, epithelial, cell membrane, resulting in undesirable systemic distribution, or (b) temporary residence of the drug within the gastrointestinal tract.

Images