Process for Enhancing Dry Strength of Paper by Treatment with Vinylamine-Containing Polymers and Acrylamide-Containing Polymers

Inactive Publication Date: 2011-06-30
SOLENIS TECH CAYMAN
View PDF19 Cites 66 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0012]Treatment of a pulp slurry with a vinylamine-containing aqueous solution polymer in combination with a ca

Problems solved by technology

Furthermore, the increased usage of recycled fiber results in a weaker sheet, forcing the papermaker to either increase basis weight of the sheet or employ synthetic strength additives.
The options that are known have various economic and technical limitations.
However, these combinations also may elevate the wet strength of the resultant paper to the point that repulping broke paper is extremely difficult and inefficient.
Polymers of acrylamide or copolymers incorporating acrylamide and a monomer such as diallyldimethylammonium chloride, when treated with a dialdehyde compound such as glyoxal, are widely known to result in resins that can also enhance the dry strength of paper significantly, yet have very limited permanent wet strength properties, allowing the papermaker to easily repulp broke paper.
However, these resins also have their limitations.
These additives either have a very short shelf-life due to viscosity instability, or are shipped at very low active solids content.
Furthermore, when added in the larger amounts, the performance of such dialdehyde-modified acrylamide-containing polymers tends to reach a plateau, making a high-performance product difficult to manufacture.
However, when added in ever increasing amounts, they have the negative effect of overflocculating the sheet because of the heavy cationic charge these resins carry.
Overflocculation results in a poorly formed, weaker finished product.
However, the aforementioned drawbacks of glyoxalated polyacrylamides, namely low active solids of the product and limited viscosity stability of the product, are clearly in play.
However, examples from the prior art that may include these polymers have significant drawbacks.
For instance, previous examples may require special metering apparatuses, additional steps for treating starch prior to addition to the pulp slurry, or high molar mass polymers that may result in overflocculation of the pulp slurry when added in sufficient amounts to affect dry strength.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

[0060]Table 1 shows the results of a pilot paper machine trial using Polymer A, amphoteric Polymer C, and cationic Polymer D. The pH of the system was adjusted to 6.5. Alum (Croydon, Pa.) and HipHase 35 rosin size (Hercules, Inc., Wilmington, Del.) were used in the amount of 0.5% and 0.3% of dry pulp, respectively. OptiPlus 1030 amphoteric starch (National Starch, Bridgewater, N.J.) was added in the place of Stalok 300 cationic starch, still used at 0.5% of dry pulp.

TABLE 1Strength and drainage properties of paper made with Polymer A and an acrylamidecontaining polymer.EntryAdditive 1%Additive 2%Dry TensileDry Mullen BurstRing CrushDrainage1————1001001001002Polymer A0.050——102.4106.2105.71103Polymer A0.125——103.2110.2108.71314——Polymer C0.100104.5105.7104.81075——Polymer C0.250103.8113.0110.11106Polymer A0.050Polymer C0.100102.8108.0110.41217Polymer A0.125Polymer C0.100112.8116.8112.61428Polymer A0.088Polymer C0.175106.5112.7117.81379Polymer A0.050Polymer C0.250110.4109.2114.212110Po...

example 2

[0062]Table 2 shows the drainage performance of three different acrylamide-containing polymer additives using the same whitewater and pulp as indicated in the strength testing illustrated in Table 1. The drainage performance was evaluated using the CSF test as indicated above. Entries 18 to 23 are shown for comparison.

TABLE 2Drainage properties of pulp made using multiple acrylamide-containingpolymers with Polymer A.% ofdry% of% ofEntryAdditive 1pulpAdditive 2dry pulpdrainage1————1002Polymer A0.050——1103Polymer A0.125——1314——Polymer C0.1001075——Polymer C0.2501106Polymer A0.050Polymer C0.1001217Polymer A0.125Polymer C0.1001428Polymer A0.088Polymer C0.1751379Polymer A0.050Polymer C0.25012110Polymer A0.125Polymer C0.25015311——Polymer D0.10012912——Polymer D0.25015013Polymer A0.050Polymer D0.10013714Polymer A0.125Polymer D0.10013715Polymer A0.088Polymer D0.17515016Polymer A0.050Polymer D0.25014217Polymer A0.125Polymer D0.25014718——Comparative Polymer E0.1009619——Comparative Polymer E0.25...

example 3

[0064]Table 3 shows results of a pilot paper machine trial using a vinylamine-containing polymer and a cationic acrylamide containing polymer. In this example, as in all following examples, the pH was maintained at 7.0, no alum was included in the furnish, and no sizing agents were employed.

TABLE 3Results of pilot paper machine trial at pH 7.0 and in the presence of Polymer B and cationicacrylamide-containing Polymer D.EntryAdditive 1%Additive 2%Dry TensileDry Mullen BurstRing CrushDrainage1————1001001001002Polymer B0.100——96.395.7100.9983Polymer B0.300——102.5104.0112.41374——Polymer D0.100104.5108.6107.11095——Polymer D0.300105.7107.4106.01156Polymer B0.100Polymer D0.100100.895.2105.61347Polymer B0.300Polymer D0.100110.1109.9116.61208Polymer B0.200Polymer D0.200112.9115.8119.91189Polymer B0.100Polymer D0.300115.7123.0113.711510Polymer B0.300Polymer D0.300110.4120.2111.3112

[0065]Table 3 demonstrates that high dosages of the two polymers, excellent strength performance can be achieved ...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
Fractionaaaaaaaaaa
Fractionaaaaaaaaaa
Fractionaaaaaaaaaa
Login to view more

Abstract

A process is disclosed for the production of paper with enhanced dry strength comprising adding to the wet end of a paper machine, (a) a vinylamine-containing aqueous solution polymer having a molecular weight of from 75,000 daltons to 750,000 daltons and (b) an amphoteric or cationic acrylamide-containing aqueous solution polymer having a molecular weight of from 75,000 daltons to 1,500,000 daltons, wherein the sum of the anionic and cationic monomers comprises at least 5% on a molar basis of the composition of the acrylamide-containing polymer.

Description

[0001]This Application claims priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61 / 290,670, filed Dec. 29, 2009, the entire contents of which are herein incorporated by reference.FIELD OF THE INVENTION[0002]This invention relates to enhanced dry strength in paper using a process of treating a pulp slurry with a combination of a vinylamine-containing polymer and a cationic or amphoteric acrylamide-containing polymer.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0003]The papermaking industry is constantly seeking new synthetic additives to improve the dry strength of paper products. Improved dry strength can give a higher performance product, but also may allow the papermaker to use less cellulosic fiber to achieve a particular performance target. Furthermore, the increased usage of recycled fiber results in a weaker sheet, forcing the papermaker to either increase basis weight of the sheet or employ synthetic strength additives. The options that are known have various economic and technical limitations. Fo...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to view more
IPC IPC(8): D21H13/26
CPCD21H17/35D21H17/37D21H21/18D21H17/56D21H17/375D21H21/14
Inventor BRUNGARDT, CLEMENT L.MCKAY, JONATHAN M.RIEHLE, RICHARD J.
Owner SOLENIS TECH CAYMAN
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Try Eureka
PatSnap group products