Supercharge Your Innovation With Domain-Expert AI Agents!

Input vector monitoring concurrency built-in self-test circuit based on comparator and response analyzer

A built-in self-test and response analysis technology, which is applied in the field of SOC test equipment, can solve the problems of large input pin test delay, high hardware cost, and unmonitorable circuits, so as to reduce hardware cost and concurrent test delay. when the effect

Active Publication Date: 2012-06-13
HARBIN INST OF TECH
View PDF5 Cites 8 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0009] The purpose of the present invention is to solve the problems of high hardware cost and excessive test delay in the existing input vector monitoring concurrent built-in self-test, so that some circuits with more input pins cannot be monitored, and a new method is proposed. A Comparator Response Analyzer Based Input Vector Monitoring Concurrent Built-In Self-Test Circuit

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Input vector monitoring concurrency built-in self-test circuit based on comparator and response analyzer
  • Input vector monitoring concurrency built-in self-test circuit based on comparator and response analyzer
  • Input vector monitoring concurrency built-in self-test circuit based on comparator and response analyzer

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

specific Embodiment approach 1

[0013] Specific implementation mode one: combine figure 1 Describe this embodiment, the input vector monitoring and built-in self-test circuit based on the comparator response analyzer of this embodiment includes a test set generator 1, an output response analyzer 2, a comparator 3 and a multiplexer 4 ;

[0014] The integrated circuit 5 under test has an n-bit input terminal, the input signal of the input terminal is the original input signal output by the upper stage circuit, and the original input signal output by the upper stage circuit is a 0 or 1 signal, and the n-bit upper stage In the original input signal output by the circuit, t bits are selected as the address signal output by the upper circuit, and the remaining n-t bits are used as non-address signals output by the upper circuit, wherein, log 2 T ≤ t ≤ n ,

[0015] The number of two-to-one multiplexers 4 is...

specific Embodiment approach 2

[0023] Specific implementation mode two: combination figure 2 Describe this embodiment, the difference between this embodiment and the specific embodiment is that the test set generator 1 includes T test vectors, T row output AND gates and n-t column output OR gates;

[0024] The t input terminals of the test set generator 1 receive the t-bit address signal output by the upper-level circuit, and the t-bit address signal output by the upper-level circuit is combined into a plurality of different input signals, and each input signal corresponds to a test vector , and send the corresponding input signal to the input of the test vector generator,

[0025] The number of the test vectors is T, and the number of bits of each test vector is n, then the test set in the test set generator 1 forms a matrix of T×n;

[0026]

[0027] The t columns in the n columns in the matrix are selected as address bits, and each row in the test set is formed into a T×n matrix as a set, if the subs...

specific Embodiment approach 3

[0038] Specific implementation mode three: combination image 3 Describe this embodiment, the difference between this embodiment and the specific embodiment 1 or 2 is that the output response analyzer 2 includes m OR gates and m response analysis comparators, and the input bus of the output response analyzer 2 is the response analyzer 2 The signal input terminal, the signal output by the input bus corresponds to an OR gate, when the signal output by the input bus is at a high level, the input terminal of the OR gate receives a logic value 1, and the output terminal of the OR gate outputs a logic value 1, or The output end of the gate is connected to the test signal input end of the response analysis comparator, the actual signal input end of the response analysis comparator is the actual signal input end of the response analyzer 2, and the actual signal input end of the response analysis comparator is connected to the integrated circuit 5 under test The output terminals of the...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

No PUM Login to View More

Abstract

An input vector monitoring concurrency built-in self-test circuit based on a comparator and a response analyzer relates to a test device of a SOC. In the current test, hardware cost is high; test time delay is long so that several circuits which have many input pins can not be monitored. By using the circuit of the invention, the above problems can be solved. A detected integrated circuit has n original input signals. The t original input signals are selected from the original input signals to be address signals and the n-t original input signals are selected to be non-address signals. Combinations of the t address signals are different. The signal is selected through an alternative multiplexer and the signal is sent to a test generator and the detected integrated circuit. The comparator compares the selector signal with a column output signal and sends a comparison signal to the test generator. The test generator and the detected integrated circuit issue an output signal and an actual output signal to the response analyzer respectively. The response analyzer compares the two signals and sends a test result. The circuit can be used for detecting the circuit which can not be detected in the past.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to a testing device for SOC. Background technique [0002] In the past forty years, the development of integrated circuits has followed Moore's Law, that is, the size of integrated circuits will double every eighteen months, and now it has entered the deep submicron stage. As the scale and integration of integrated circuits continue to increase, the manufacturing cost of the chip is also reduced. However, the increase in the complexity of the chip makes the testing cost of the chip more and more high. Since the chip test cost is a part of the total chip cost, which makes the chip test cost account for an increasing proportion of the total cost, so how to reduce the chip test cost has become a problem of great concern to people. [0003] The development of semiconductor technology has greatly improved the performance of VLSI, especially processors. However, as the size of transistors and interconnects decreases, supply voltages d...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
IPC IPC(8): G01R31/3185
Inventor 俞洋彭喜元乔立岩王继业王帅
Owner HARBIN INST OF TECH
Features
  • R&D
  • Intellectual Property
  • Life Sciences
  • Materials
  • Tech Scout
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Unparalleled Data Quality
  • Higher Quality Content
  • 60% Fewer Hallucinations
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More