Method for evaluating polymer laser marking effect
A technology of laser marking and evaluation method, applied in the field of measurement, can solve the problems of large error and poor repeatability of results, and achieve the effect of objective and accurate evaluation and simple operation
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Examples
preparation example Construction
[0022] The preparation and marking methods of materials in the following examples are as follows:
[0023] The raw materials are extruded, granulated and dried in a twin-screw extruder at 190-220°C, injected into standard color plates at 210-220°C, and then marked with a Tide Laser Nd-YAG marking machine (wavelength 1064nm) ) for laser marking, use the Ultra scan XE colorimeter to measure the change of lightness and darkness before and after marking the material △L, the change of color difference △E before and after the material marking, and calculate the absolute value of the difference |△E—△L |.
Embodiment 1
[0025] The raw material is polypropylene, black, the marking process parameters (current intensity 14A, frequency 1kHz, step size decreases from 1mm to 0.0005mm), the marking pattern is a square matrix, and the results are shown in Table 1:
[0026] Table 1 Marking evaluation effect under different step length conditions
[0027] step length(mm)
[0028] It can be seen from Example 1 that with the increase of the step size, △L, △E and |△E—△L| all show a decreasing trend, and the laser marking effect gradually becomes worse. When the step size increases to After 1mm, the color difference before and after the material cursor becomes less obvious, and the marking effect is relatively poor. Therefore, the actual laser marking process selection step size is ideal between 0.005-0.0005. The marking effect is ideal when △L is in the range of 2.5-5.0 and △E is in the range of 2.5-5.0.
Embodiment 2
[0030] The material is PA66, gray, the marking process parameters (the current intensity is increased from 0A to 20A, the frequency is 1kHz, the step size is 0.005mm), and the marking pattern is concentric circles. The results are shown in Table 2:
[0031] Table 2 Marking evaluation results under different current intensities
[0032] Current intensity (A)
[0033] It can be seen from Example 2 that with the increase of current intensity, △L, △E and |△E—△L| all showed a gradual increase trend, and when the current increased to 15A, △L increased to 4.1 , the color difference before and after the cursor of the material is obvious, and the marking effect is good. Therefore, it is ideal to choose the current intensity between 15 and 20A for the actual laser marking process. The marking effect is ideal when △L is in the range of 2.5-5.0 and △E is in the range of 2.5-5.0.
PUM
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
- R&D Engineer
- R&D Manager
- IP Professional
- Industry Leading Data Capabilities
- Powerful AI technology
- Patent DNA Extraction
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.
© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com