Method of generating chemical compounds having desired properties

Abstract

A computer based, iterative process for generating chemical entities with defined physical, chemical and / or bioactive properties. During each iteration of the process, (1) a directed diversity chemical library is robotically generated in accordance with robotic synthesis instructions; (2) the compounds in the directed diversity chemical library are analyzed to identify compounds with the desired properties; (3) structure-property data are used to select compounds to be synthesized in the next iteration; and (4) new robotic synthesis instructions are automatically generated to control the synthesis of the directed diversity chemical library for the next iteration.

Description

[0001] 1. Field of the Invention[0002] The present invention relates generally to the generation of chemical entities with defined physical, chemical or bioactive properties, and particularly to the automatic generation of drug leads via computer-based, iterative robotic synthesis and analysis of directed diversity chemical libraries.[0003] 2. Related Art[0004] Conventionally, new chemical entities with useful properties are generated by identifying a chemical compound (called a "lead compound") with some desirable property or activity, creating variants of the lead compound, and evaluating the property and activity of those variant compounds. Examples of chemical entities with useful properties include paints, finishes, plasticizers, surfactants, scents, flavorings, and bioactive compounds, but can also include chemical compounds with any other useful property that depends upon chemical structure, composition, or physical state. Chemical entities with desirable biological activitie...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

There are a number of flaws with this conventional approach to lead generation, particularly as it pertains to the discovery of bioactive compounds.

One deficiency pertains to the first step of the conventional approach, i.e., the identification of lead compounds.

Traditionally, the search for lead compounds has been limited to an analysis of compound banks, for example, available commercial, custom, or natural products chemical libraries.

Consequently, a fundamental limitation of the conventional approach is the dependence upon the availability, size, and structural diversity of these chemical libraries.

Thus, the conventional approach is limited by the relatively small pool of previously identified chemical compounds which may be screened to identify new lead compounds.

However, as stated by Rudy M. Baum in his article "Combinatorial Approaches Provide Fresh Leads for Medicinal Chemistry," C&EN, Feb. 7, 1994, pages 20-26, "chemical intuition, at least to date, has not proven to be a particularly good source of lead compounds for the drug discovery process."

Another deficiency pertains to the second step of the conventional approach, i.e., the creation of variants of lead compounds.

Thus, the generation of lead compound variants is very labor intensive and time consuming.

For example, it typically takes many chemist years to produce even a small subset of the compound variants for a single lead compound.

Overall, the traditional approach to new lead generation is an inefficient, labor-intensive, time consuming process of limited scope.

To date, most work with combinatorial chemical libraries has been limited only to peptides and oligonucleotides for the purpose of identifying bioactive agents; little research has been performed using non-peptide, non-nucleotide based combinatorial chemical libraries.

However, there is no consensus on how such compounds (identified as having desirable bioactive properties and desirable profile for medicinal use) can be used.

This is unlikely, however, for a number of reasons.

First, such compounds would likely lack metabolic stability.

Second, such compounds would be very expensive to manufacture, since the chemical building blocks from which they are made most likely constitute high priced reagents.

Third, such compounds would tend to have a large molecular weight, such that they would have bioavailability problems (i.e., they could only be taken by injection).

However, the use of combinatorial chemical libraries in this manner does not solve all of the problems associated with the conventional lead generation procedure.

Specifically, the problem associated with manually synthesizing variants of the lead compounds is not resolved.

In fact, the use of combinatorial chemical libraries to generate lead compounds exacerbates this problem.

However, it is more difficult, time consuming, and costly to synthesize variants of larger compounds.

Furthermore, the real issues of structural and functional group diversity are still not directly addressed; bioactive agents such as drugs and agricultural products possess diversity that could never be achieved with available peptide and oligonucleotide libraries since the available peptide and oligonucleotide components only possess limited functional group diversity and limited topology imposed through the inherent nature of the available components.

Thus, the difficulties associated with synthesizing variants of lead compounds are exacerbated by using typical peptide and oligonucleotide combinatorial chemical libraries to produce such lead compounds.

The issues described above are not limited to bioactive agents but rather to any lead generating paradigm for which a chemical agent of defined and specific activity is desired.

This task is combinatorially explosive, i.e., in all but the simplest cases, N is far too large to allow for the construction and evaluation of each individual subset given current data processing technology.

Thus, the phrase "computer control" does not rule out the possibility that optional human intervention may be involved in the process.

Images