Geothermal system operable between heat recovery and heat storage modes

Abstract

The geothermal system uses an outer and an inner pipe installed in a single borehole. Cool fluids are pumped down through one pipe and returned to the surface through the other pipe. Subterranean heat increases the temperature of the cool fluid and this heat is returned to the surface where the heated fluid is recovered. The fluid with the heat removed is then pumped back down the borehole to be re-heated. Extra heat recovered from the ground surrounding a lower portion of the borehole is stored in the ground and rock formation surrounding an upper portion of the borehole during warmer seasons to optimize the amount of heat stored in the ground for extraction during colder seasons.

Description

[0001]This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 62 / 693,939, filed Jul. 4, 2018.FIELD OF THE INVENTION[0002]The present invention relates to the recovery of heat from a geothermal system including a well in the ground from which heat is extracted, and more particularly the present invention relates to a geothermal system which is seasonal varied between a heat recovery mode in which heat is drawn out of the geothermal well and a heat storage mode in which heat is stored in the geothermal well.BACKGROUND[0003]Below the Earth's surface, temperature increases with depth. The rate of temperature increase, or geothermal gradient typically ranges between 2 and 3° C. per 100 metres of depth. However, in some regions, the gradient can be significantly higher with very hot temperatures found closer to the Earth's surface. Current technologies are exploiting some of these near surface hot spots for electrical power generation and heatin...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

This patent describes a method for improving the efficiency of heat recovery through a heat exchanger system. The method involves partially or fully insulating the inner pipe to minimize heat loss and recover heat at a suitable temperature for various uses without the need for additional heat. The method also involves modifications to the previously developed single well coaxial pipe technology to increase the amount of recoverable heat and temperature at surface. These modifications include adding insulation to the piping and diverting flow to minimize heat loss. Additionally, the method may involve expanding the rock material surrounding the outer pipe to prevent upward migration of formational fluids and gasses and to close fissures in the rock material. These modifications can significantly reduce costs and improve heat recovery efficiency.

Problems solved by technology

The cost of drilling the wells is high, and the success rate of properly connecting the two wells at depth can be relatively low.

Further, the connected zone between the well pairings is difficult to control as there are fluid losses in to the rock formations.

In this case a significant amount of pumping is required to counteract the fluid loss.

The greatest drawback of the single aquifer pumping well method is when there is less than adequate water recharge from the aquifer.

Furthermore, the fluid returned to the surface may contain high levels of noxious contaminants which have to be disposed of safely.

Formational water can also be corrosive which reduces the life expectancy of the pipes and pumps.

The disadvantage of this heat exchanger technology is the significantly reduced amount of heat recovered.

Technically it is difficult to achieve sufficient water residence time for boreholes less than 178 mmm diameter.

Further, the higher the flow velocity of the injected water reduces the residence time which reduces the amount of heat recovered.

There are two key factors that limit the economics of the coaxial well technology.

The first factor is the high cost and the space restrictions of the insulated inner pipe.

The second factor is the restricted heat recovery due to the shortened residence time of the fluid during the heat transfer process.

Although the heat exchange technology has significant environmental benefits, low heat productivity and high capital costs have prevented this technology from flourishing.

Images