Graphene composite and method of producing the same
A manufacturing method and graphene technology, applied in the field of graphene composites and its manufacturing, can solve the problems of poor production efficiency and time-consuming graphene dispersion
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0122]
[0123] For utilizing such as image 3 A method for obtaining a graphitic carbon raw material usable as a graphene precursor using the shown production apparatus A using a jet mill and plasma will be described. In the manufacturing apparatus A, a case where plasma is performed as a process by radio wave force and a jet mill is used as a process by mechanical force is exemplified.
[0124] image 3 Among them, symbol 1 is a natural graphite material with particles below 5 mm (flaky graphite ACB-50 manufactured by Nippon Graphite Industry Co., Ltd.); 2 is a hopper for containing natural graphite material 1; 3 is a Venturi nozzle for spraying natural graphite material 1 from hopper 2 ; 4 is the jet mill that makes the natural graphite material collide with the jet flow in the cavity from the air sprayed from 5 points and 8 places of the compressor; 7 is the plasma generating device, which makes the oxygen, Argon, nitrogen, hydrogen and other gases 9 are sprayed from t...
Embodiment 2
[0198] In Example 1, the case where ultrasonic treatment and microwave treatment are used in combination to obtain a graphene dispersion has been described, but in Example 2, only ultrasonic treatment is performed without microwave treatment, and other conditions are the same as in Example 1.
[0199] Figure 15 (b) shows the distribution of the number of layers of the graphene dispersion obtained by ultrasonic treatment using the graphene precursor of sample 5 (Rate (3R)=46%) produced by the production apparatus B. It should be noted, Figure 15 (a) Comparison with Sample 5 manufactured by Manufacturing Apparatus B in Example 1 Figure 11 The distribution shown in (b) is the same.
[0200] As a result, the distribution of the number of layers tended to be substantially the same, but the proportion of graphene having 10 or less layers was 64%, which was slightly lower than 68% in Example 1.
[0201] From this, it can be seen that when preparing a graphene dispersion, it is ...
Embodiment 3
[0203] In Example 3, an example using conductive ink will be described.
[0204] Sample 1 (Rate (3R)=23%) of embodiment 1, sample 3 (Rate (3R)=38%), sample 5 (Rate (3R)=46%), sample 6 (Rate ( 3R)=51%) as a graphene precursor, ink 1, ink 3, ink 3, For ink 5 and ink 6, compare their respective resistance values. From this result, it was obtained that the resistance value decreased as Rate (3R) increased.
PUM
Login to View More Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 