Livestock and poultry meat quality improver and application thereof
A meat quality improver, a technology for livestock and poultry, which is applied in the field of livestock breeding, can solve problems such as reducing the quality of meat products, and achieve the effects of improving nutritional value, good meat quality, and providing feed intake.
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0051] The formula in the livestock and poultry meat quality improver provided by the present invention: with every 100 parts content, wherein:
[0052] Yeast selenium: 6 parts; Magnesium sulfate: 15 parts; Baking soda: 15 parts; Vitamin E: 0.5 parts; Small peptide: 15 parts; Threonine: 8 parts; Betaine: 15 parts; Choline: 8 parts; Astragalus 7 parts; 1 part of licorice; 1 part of Codonopsis pilosula; 1 part of Eucommia; 0.5 parts of black sesame;
[0053] Select 18 hybrid pigs with normal growth and development and a body weight of about 100kg from the pig farm, and divide them into two columns at random for feeding (the two columns are respectively named as the livestock and poultry meat quality improver group and the control group), with 9 pigs in each column, and the ratio of male to female is the same. The poultry meat quality improver group was fed with basal ration + 1% livestock and poultry meat improver, and the control group was fed with basal ration. The experiment...
Embodiment 2
[0071] The difference between this example and Example 1 is that the proportions in this example are yeast selenium: 5 parts; magnesium sulfate: 8 parts; baking soda: 9 parts; vitamin E: 0.2 parts; small peptide: 8 parts; Amino acid: 8 parts; Betaine: 8 parts; Choline: 10 parts; Astragalus 5 parts; Licorice 0.5 part; Codonopsis 0.5 part; Eucommia 0.5 part; The sum of the points is 100.
[0072] The results obtained in Example 2 are not statistically different from those in Example 1 (P>0.05), that is, they are consistent with the results in Example 1 within a certain error range.
Embodiment 3
[0074] The difference between this example and Example 1 is that the proportions in this example are yeast selenium: 9 parts; magnesium sulfate: 6 parts; baking soda: 14 parts; vitamin E: 1.5 parts; small peptide: 12 parts; amino acid: 12 parts; betaine: 13 parts; choline: 6 parts; astragalus 10 parts; licorice 1.5 parts; Codonopsis 1.5 parts; Eucommia 2.5 parts; The sum of the points is 100.
[0075] The results obtained in Example 3 are not statistically different from those in Example 1 (P>0.05), that is, they are consistent with the results in Example 1 within a certain error range.
PUM
Login to View More Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 