Methods and compositions for reducing stress corrosion cracking
a technology composition, applied in the direction of other chemical processes, fuels, chemistry apparatus and processes, etc., can solve the problems of stress corrosion cracking in steel vessels, contamination of ground water supplies, etc., and achieve the effect of reducing stress corrosion cracking
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Benefits of technology
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
example 1
Slow Strain Rate Testing of Single-Treated Fuel Grade Ethanol
[0028]The effect on stress corrosion cracking on a steel sample of 13 different additives, either oxygen scavengers or film-forming additives, in fuel grade ethanol was determined in this Example, All testing was performed pursuant to the procedures outlined in ASTM G 129. Each of the additives was combined with a hid grade ethanol at the concentration indicated in Table 1, below, which was then employed to determine the respective additive's efficacy at reducing stress corrosion cracking of a steel sample according to ASTM G 129. A 5 weight percent solution of oxygen scavenger or film-forming additive composition in fuel grade ethanol was prepared by weighing 5 grams of oxygen scavenger or film-forming additive and 95 grams of fuel grade ethanol. The oxygen scavenger or film-forming additive was then dissolved in the 95 g of fuel grade ethanol over a period of about 1 minute at room temperature. Ten mL of the resulting so...
example 2
Slow Strain Rate Testing of Dual-Treated Fuel Grade Ethanol
[0031]Four samples containing both an oxygen scavenger and a film-forming additive were prepared and dissolved in fuel grade ethanol, then tested according to the same conditions set forth in Example 1. The first sample contained a combination of ascorbic acid and 85 weight percent diisopropanol amine (“DIPA”) and was prepared by first preparing a solution of ascorbic acid by dissolving 10 parts by weight of ascorbic acid in 45 parts by weight of fuel ethanol and 45 parts by weight distilled water. 10 parts by weight of this solution was then combined with 90 parts of the 85 weight percent DIPA. The second sample contained a combination of carbohydrazide and DIPA and was prepared by dissolving 25 parts by weight of commercial carbohydrazide in 75 parts by weight distilled water. 10 parts by weight of this solution was then combined with 90 parts by weight of the 85 weight percent DIPA. The third sample contained a combinatio...
example 3
Time-to-Failure from Treated and Untreated Fuel Grade Ethanol
[0033]The time-to-failure of eight steel samples was determined according to ASTM G-129 from an untreated fuel grade ethanol and seven samples of treated fuel grade ethanol. One of the treated samples contained only a film-forming additive, three of the treated fuel grade ethanol samples each contained only an oxygen scavenger, while the other three treated fuel grade ethanol samples each contained both an oxygen scavenger and a film-forming additive. The fuel grade ethanol is the same fuel grade ethanol as described above in Example 1. Additionally, each of the treated samples was the same as described above in Examples 1 and 2. A summary of the samples and the results obtained is provided below in Table 3.
TABLE 3Time-to-Failure from Treated and Untreated Fuel Grade EthanolTime-to-Conc.*FailureSampleType(ppmw)(hours)Untreated Fuel——50.7Grade EthanolDIPAFilm Former50054.5Ascorbic AcidO2 Scavenger50047.2CarbohydrazideO2 Sca...
PUM
| Property | Measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| weight percent | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| carbon number | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| weight percent | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


