Base load generators such as
nuclear power plants and generators with stochastic, intermittent energy sources, such as wind turbines and solar panels, may generate excess electrical power during times of low
power demand.
However, it may be important that all electric energy storage technologies inherently have a limited round-trip efficiency due to thermodynamic limitations.
The rest of the electrical energy is lost.
Firstly, the conversion of heat to mechanical work in a
heat engine is limited due to the Carnot efficiency.
This fact inevitably degrades the temperature level and thus the capability of the heat to do work.
The transfer of heat over large temperature differences is a thermodynamic irreversibility factor.
This means that the larger the temperature differences between the working fluid and the thermal storage medium in the heat exchangers are, the lower the round-trip efficiency will be.
However, these solutions may result in high costs and may generally not be practical.
In such an application, any increase of heat exchange temperature losses during charging and discharging may directly translate into a loss of useful work and reduction of the round trip efficiency of the system.
Another
disadvantage of known
ice storage systems may be that these systems usually cannot exceed an ice content of 50%, which means that half of the thermal storage is unused, increasing both the
capital cost of the system and also its
footprint.
The downside is that due to its high back-work ratio, a
Brayton cycle thermoelectric storage system may suffer from increased losses in the
heat pump expansion and
heat engine compression steps compared to other thermoelectric storage system designs.
These losses can be counteracted by pushing the operating temperatures of the
cold side and hot side of the cycles respectively to very low and very high values, which in turn may make it necessary to store the
sensible heat to
solid materials such as rocks or sand via special purpose contraptions eventually losing the potential benefit of
sensible heat storage through a known fluid-to-fluid heat exchanger.
Thus, it may be problematic to apply the optimization principles of a refrigerator system or a
heat engine system to a thermoelectric storage system, because the optimization of the one cycle may degrade the efficiency of the other cycle.
A major hurdle in achieving high efficiencies in thermoelectric storage system operation may be large temperature differences between the hot side and
cold side in heat exchangers.
Minimizing temperature differences in heat exchangers may become especially challenging when
latent heat storage systems are used and the heat transfer involves conduction through the
solid phase of the
storage material which might be the case with the above mentioned transcritical thermoelectric storage system.