Even at relatively high thermal efficiencies, this only provides about one fourth of the
thermal energy needed to cool the entire building area below the skylights.
However, the cost of installation per unit of
thermal energy generated by conventional thermal collectors is much higher than that generated by previously presented energy managing skylights, and the overall project economics can be significantly degraded.
This has the
advantage of providing firm capacity during periods of low
sunlight, but the expense of the gas
backup degrades the project economics and the additional
fossil fuel use works against one of the main product objectives of being a primary
renewable energy source.
One problem with
night sky radiant cooling is that the typical cooling heat fluxes are only about 1 / 10 those which can be achieved during solar collection of
sunlight.
Also, the
cooling effect is generally uncorrelated in time with the cooling loads.
Several techniques have been described for
night sky radiant cooling, such as flushing the roof surface with water at night, and using relatively low efficiency solar collectors as radiators at night, but these techniques are not practical as yet.
The fundamental problem with using solar collectors as
radiant cooling devices is that the design of the collector is intended to thermally isolate the fluid from the
ambient air and the radiant
sky environment.
These high stagnation temperatures then drive the need for even more expensive materials and components to ensure that the panel does not damage itself in full
sunlight.
The drive for higher efficiency and the need to withstand high stagnation temperatures increases the cost per unit area of the solar collector.
The relatively high cost per unit area, plus the perceived need to generate the most energy in the winter, generally makes it imperative to orient the collector in an optimal position to capture the most possible sunlight to convert to thermal energy.
Orienting the panel at such a relatively
high angle to the horizontal roof brings many problems and costs to the system installation.
On buildings with large flat roofs in relatively high wind areas, it is often not practical to even install large numbers of flat plate solar collectors due to the structural reinforcements that would be required to
handle the wind loads.
Evacuated tube collectors may have lower but still significant wind loads.
The wind loads also drive significant structural requirements for the panel itself.
Furthermore, mounting the panel at an inclined position exposes the back of the panel to
ambient air, resulting in the need for thick insulation to prevent significant loss from the back of the collector.
As the heat is conducted along the relatively thin absorber surface, there is a significant
temperature drop between the absorbing surface and the
working fluid.
This
temperature drop results in thermal losses of between 12 and 18 percent, because the higher temperature of the absorber surface compared to the
fluid temperature results in higher losses to the environment.
In addition, an efficient fin design requires creating a good thermal bond between the flat sheet and the fluid tube, which is a significant design challenge that drives up costs and creates failure points.
Further, nearly all current designs place the absorber surfaces directly under the glazing.
This causes a direct convective and radiative
coupling between the two surfaces, accounting for the majority of the heat loss from the collector.
The glazing is typically made of low-iron glass, which has a high light transmissivity of about 90% but which is heavy, is a very poor insulator and so does not maintain more than a few degrees
temperature difference across it.
In addition, many such coatings make use of toxic materials that require special handling, all adding considerable expense to the finished product.
There are several fundamental limitations which have thus far prevented the deployment of high efficiency, low cost,
polymer (i.e., plastic) collectors.
The first problem is the
low melting point of plastics that are sufficiently low in cost to be considered for use as collectors.
Secondly, extruded panels with discrete flow channels must be connected to a header or manifold.
The
irregular shape of this welded joint makes the joint difficult to fabricate and prone to leakage with thermal cycles.
Further, all plastics have very low strength and stiffness relative to metals.
This makes it difficult for plastic solar panels to contain typical aqueous
heat transfer fluid that in ordinary solar thermal systems can reach pressures of 150 PSI.