One of these challenges is the fact that wearing mask causes the eyewear to be exposed to the air of exhaling.
The air of exhaling, while wearing a mask, causes formation of fog on the eyewear.
Hence, the leaked exhaled air moves on the surface of the eyewear and causes formation of fog on the surface of the eyewear.
However, it is impossible to
pull up the mask higher than the eye because the mask will block the eye of the user.
Noteless, taping the mask on the
skin of the face causes discomfort, and may also cause allergies and other issues related to the health of the
skin of the face of the user.
In Addition, such method causes the flow of the air from the top of the mask to be blocked.
This blockage put more pressure on the other parts of the mask when inhaling and exhaling the flow of air.
This may also cause overheating the air inside the mask.
This method may also cause less
fresh air and
oxygen to enter the mask for the user to inhale.
The user may also need to put more force for inhaling and exhaling the air as there would be less opening around the mask to facilitate the flow of the air which may result in inconvenience for the user.
Hence, without taping with an
adhesive material, complete sealing of the upper edge of the mask is not possible solely by use of pliable material.
Hence, these forces cannot push the pliable material and the upper edge of the mask over the dents of the face of the user directly.
However, taping the mask on the
skin of the face is inconvenient.
Taping the mask on the skin of the face can also causes allergies and other issues related to the health of the skin of the face of the user.
In Addition, such method causes the flow of the air from the top of the mask to be blocked.
This blockage put more pressure on the other parts of the mask when inhaling and exhaling the flow of air.
This may also cause overheating the air inside the mask.
This method may also cause less
fresh air and
oxygen to enter the mask for the user to inhale.
The user may also need to put more force for inhaling and exhaling the air as there would be less opening around the mask to facilitate the flow of the air which may result in inconvenience for the user.
Use of batteries impose weight on the eyewear and causes inconvenience for the user.
In addition, batteries have limited
energy storage and are needed to be renewed often.
Generating heat close to the eyes and face of the user may also cause inconvenience.
Applying heat to the lenses may cause damage in the lenses as well.
Hence, U.S. Pat. No. 4,944,294 does not provide a solution to the problem of formation of fog on all types of eyewear, whereas the disclosed device in the present
patent application does not require modifications in the eyewear and does not require the eyewear to be made of anti-glare, anti-fog material.
Nonetheless, by a simple experiment that includes taping the upper edge of the mask to the skin, it is revealed that the leaked exhaled air from the openings between the top of the mask and the skin of the user is responsible for formation of most of the fog on the eyewear.
Hence, redirecting the exhaled breath that rises from the mask itself downwardly by using the impervious element in U.S. Pat. No. 3,888,246 would not effectively contribute to solving the problem of formation of fog on the eyewear while wearing a mask.
Hence, the mask proposed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,888,246 shall not contribute effectively to solving the problem of formation of fog on the eyewear while wearing a mask.
Applying chemicals to the mask and eyewear may be an expensive and inconvenient process.
It might alter characteristics of the mask and the eyewear as well and might cause allergies and other health concerns for the user.
Nonetheless, manufacturing a mask with two different filtering materials increases the cost.
Even if the mask in U.S. Pat. No. 4,419,993 may have an upper body that is less
preamble to air than the
lower body, formation of fog on the eyewear will not be prevented because the exhaled air leaks from the openings between the skin of the face of the user and the upper edge of the mask.
Also, with regard to the sealing, since the top of the mask covers the part of the face of the user that includes organs (such as
nose) in the face of
human being that are not shaped uniformly (and hence, the face is not flat and is not shaped spherically), there is no way to prevent openings between the skin of the user and the top of the mask unless
adhesive tapes are used for sealing the top of the mask to the skin of the face of the user, or the sealing force is applied by direct force from the front of the face of the user (as disclosed in an embodiment in the present
patent application) not the straps (and not rubber bands) that secure the mask to the face of the user through back of the ears or back of the
skull.
Hence, the mask proposed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,419,993 may not effectively contribute to solving the problem of formation of fog on the eyewear while wearing a mask.