Cold ejection energy recovery device

Abstract

The invention relates to a cold ejection energy recovery device which adopts the structure that an energy recovery pump and a jumping cylinder are installed on a reciprocating vehicle, and a limiting and blocking oil cylinder is installed on a guide slide rail or adopts the structure that a movable slide rail is hinged at the front end of the guide slide rail, and the energy recovery pump and the jumping cylinder are installed on the movable guide rail. Through the cold ejection energy recovery device, inertia energy is converted into hydraulic energy, the hydraulic energy is converted into mechanical energy to push a plane to finally sprint and jump to a proper elevation, so as to finish self independent taking-off or jack the movable guide rail to jump to a proper elevation, and finish the self independent taking-off. The cold ejection energy recovery device has the advantages of simple structure, small volume, light weight, easiness in manufacturing and small power consumption; the inertia energy is recovered, converted and utilized, the ejection power consumption is greatly reduced, the running distance is shortened, and the ejection continuity is increased to facilitate use on various naval vessels.

Description

Technical field: [0001] The invention relates to the technical field of engineering mechanics, in particular to an ejection energy recovery device in a cold state where the machine is completely closed, and can be widely used in aircraft carriers, torpedoes, missiles, accident rescue, destroyed airports, caverns, offshore drilling platforms, islands Contact etc. Background technique: [0002] All countries regard catapults as the lifeblood of aircraft carriers, and the United States takes the lead. The reason why it will become a world problem is that a truly effective carrier ejection method has not been discovered, and existing catapults have many shortcomings: [0003] For example, the steam catapult in the United States uses open cylinder technology. The system is huge, complex, expensive, difficult to manufacture and maintain, and has an efficiency of only 4-6%. It is difficult to meet the ejection requirements of larger aircraft and has developed to the limit. [0004...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0003] For example, the steam catapult in the United States uses open cylinder technology. The system is huge, complex, expensive, difficult to manufacture and maintain, and has only 4-6% efficiency. It is difficult to meet the ejection requirements of larger aircraft and has developed to the limit.

[0004] Another example is the electromagnetic catapult (EMALS) being developed by the United States, which uses flywheel forced energy storage and linear motor technology. The disadvantages are: 1) the effect of "forced energy storage" is not good, and EMALS uses a flywheel (ie rotor) to force energy storage The difficulty is high, the small flywheel does not work, the speed is high and unstable, and the large flywheel is not allowed due to the conditions on the ship, and the coupling of the energy storage and the load is difficult to realize. Finally, multiple sets of flywheel motor generators are used. Disc-type generators are installed in pairs on the torque frame, and each rotor is forced to store a little limited kinetic energy with reverse high-speed rotation. Every time you prepare for battle, you must first start these disc-type generators before they can eject energy. This is both The target was exposed, and the fighter opportunity was missed! During the entire preparation period, the average power of its supplementary energy is as high as 6.35MW, and the stored energy is used to force the equipment to wear out (do harmful work) at a high speed of 6400rpm, and only about 20% of the peak period is in the 2-3 seconds of ejection. In the ejection process, the stator loss of the linear motor, the heat loss of the cyclic frequency converter and the loss of the disc generator are added together, that is, the efficiency of EMALS at the moment of ejection can reach 60%, but the entire preparation period 2) There are many intermediate links, because the ejection speed required by the aircraft carrier cannot be achieved by the magnetic field movement speed of the linear motor alone, and EMALS can only be used after the high-power electronic equipment is used to increase the frequency and voltage. , thus increasing investment again, the United States has been developing aircraft carrier electromagnetic catapults for 28 years, costing 3.2 billion U.S. dollars, and so far EMALS has not been used on ships; 3) It has strong electromagnetic interference, which hinders the application of its high-sensitivity aircraft and guidance systems ; 4) It adopts the eddy current plus commutation braking method, which is not safe; 5) The important thing is the weapon performance. The electromagnetic catapult usually responds to unfavorable conditions such as emergencies and severe sea conditions, and cannot be ejected in time and at the right time. Affects the number and weight of carrier-based aircraft, which is unfavorable to the stability and righting moment of the ship

Images