Neural network adaptive control method of non-contact type suspension grabbing system
An adaptive control and neural network technology, applied in the field of non-contact magnetic levitation transmission, can solve problems such as falling objects, excessive wind resistance, and affecting the stability of the grasped object, achieving low power consumption, low noise, and improving two degrees of freedom Effect of gripping and handling performance
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
example 1
[0158] Example 1, the simulation experiment of the optimal setting of the grasping height during the handling process, such as image 3 , Figure 4 and Figure 5 As shown, after the object to be grasped is suspended stably, it is transported horizontally at a speed of 25.1cm / s at t=0.5s. Increased to 4.53×10-5mm, after one oscillation cycle, the gripping height optimization setting of formula (7) reduces the axial gripping height to 8mm, and its gripping height optimization performance is shown in Table 2, and the gripping height is stable The time is 0.15s, the initial horizontal oscillation range of the axial air gap is 2.86×10-5mm, and the oscillation range increases to 4.53×10-5mm after increasing the speed. After the suspension height is optimized and set, the present invention returns to the initial oscillation range under the control , which proves that the control of the present invention has a strong ability to adapt to changes in working conditions and dynamic perf...
example 2
[0161] Example 2, the simulation experiment of axial grasping and rising, such as Figure 6 , Figure 7 and Figure 8 As shown, the suspension grabbing height is set to 14mm, the suspension grabbing is started at t=0s, and the wind resistance in the rapid ascent process is simulated at t=5s, and the axial resistance of 0.9sin[9(t-5)]N is applied to carry out the The comparison results of axial air gap tracking under PID control and the axial air gap tracking of the present invention are shown in Table 3. No matter in terms of grasping height change, recovery time, air gap oscillation range and stabilization time, the control effect of the present invention is Obviously better than PID control.
[0162] Table 3 Axial interference force application performance comparison
[0163]
PUM
Login to View More Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


