Non-woven felt with reduced transmittance and increased caliper size
A non-woven, low-density technology, applied in the field of non-woven mats, can solve the problems of increasing the production cost of non-woven glass mats, increasing costs, increasing the basis weight of non-woven glass mats, etc.
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0069] In this example, a nonwoven mat according to the invention (Sample Mat 1) and a control nonwoven mat (Control Mat 1) were formed and compared. Both Sample Mat 1 and Control Mat 1 contained a blend of 60 wt % 13 μm glass fibers and 40 wt % 10 μm fibers (based on the total weight of glass fibers). In addition, the basis weight of each of Sample Felt 1 and Control Felt 1 is 1.5 lbs / 100 ft 2 and LOI is 22%. The adhesive composition used to form Sample Mat 1 contained 5% by weight (on a dry basis) of polymeric microspheres (Expancel 551WU40). The adhesive composition used to form Control Felt 1 was otherwise identical to the adhesive composition used to form Sample Felt 1 but did not contain any polymer microspheres. The adhesive compositions used for both Control Felt 1 and Sample Felt 1 were based on QR1629S from Dow Chemical (Philadelphia, PA, USA).
[0070] Sample Felt 1 and Control Felt 1 were tested for air permeability according to ASTM D737—Standard Test Method fo...
Embodiment 2
[0072] In this example, a nonwoven felt according to the invention (Sample Felt 2) and a control nonwoven felt (Control Felt 2) were formed and compared. Both sample mat 2 and control mat 2 contained a blend (percentage) of 60 wt% 13 μm glass fibers (average length 19.05 mm (0.75 in)) and 40 wt % 10 μm fibers (average length 10 mm (0.39 in)) is based on the total weight of glass fibers). Additionally, the basis weight of each of Sample Felt 2 and Control Felt 2 was approximately 1.5 lbs / 100 ft 2 and LOI is about 21%. The adhesive composition used to form Sample Mat 2 contained 10% by weight (on a dry weight basis) of polymeric microspheres (Expancel 551WU40). The adhesive composition used to form Control Felt 2 was otherwise identical to the adhesive composition used to form Sample Felt 2 but did not contain any polymer microspheres. The binder compositions for both Control Felt 2 and Sample Felt 2 were based on QR 1629S from Dow Chemical (Philadelphia, PA, USA) and contain...
Embodiment 3
[0076] In this example, nonwoven mats according to the invention (Sample Felt 3 and Sample Felt 4) and a control nonwoven mat (Control Felt 3) were formed and compared. All mats were formed using 10 μm glass fibers with a length of 10 mm. Additionally, the basis weight of all felts is approximately 1.5lbs / 100ft 2 and LOI is about 24%. The adhesive composition used to form Sample Mat 3 was based on QR1629S from Dow Chemical (Philadelphia, PA, USA) and contained 5 wt% (on a dry basis) of polymeric microspheres (Expancel 551WU40) and 2 wt% (on a dry basis) microfibrillated cellulose fibers. The adhesive composition used to form Sample Felt 4 was the same as Sample Felt 3, but a different grade of polymer microspheres (Expancel 043WU80) was used. The adhesive composition used to form Control Felt 3 was otherwise identical to the adhesive composition used to form Sample Felts 3 and 4 but did not contain any polymer microspheres.
[0077] The caliper dimensions of each felt were...
PUM
| Property | Measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| diameter | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| diameter | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| diameter | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More