Unlock instant, AI-driven research and patent intelligence for your innovation.

Process for hydrodesulphurizing gasoline employing a catalyst with controlled porosity

a hydrodesulphurizing gasoline and catalyst technology, applied in the field of desulphurization process, can solve the problems of limiting olefin hydrogenation, allowing the formation of recombination mercaptans, large drop in octane number of cut, etc., and achieves the effect of reducing the total sulphur content, minimizing the reduction in octane number, and reducing the yield of gasolin

Inactive Publication Date: 2006-01-05
INST FR DU PETROLE
View PDF2 Cites 31 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0012] The residual sulphur-containing compounds present in gasoline desulphurized by deep hydrodesulphurization comprise recombination mercaptans derived from the addition of H2S formed during the reaction to the olefins present and to unsaturated sulphur-containing compounds such as thiophene and alkylthiophenes. The presence of recombination mercaptans at least in part explains why, when seeking to deep desulphurize gasoline comprising an olefin fraction, a major increase in the degree of olefin hydrogenation is observed for high degrees of desulphurization. Thus, when the desired degree of desulphurization approaches 100%, the degree of olefin saturation is greatly increased. The use of more selective catalysts may, however, when degrees of desulphurizing close to 100% are desired, limit olefin hydrogenation or allow the formation of recombination mercaptans. One of the primary aims of deep desulphurization is thus to develop processes that can attain high selectivities, i.e. minimize olefin hydrogenation reactions while treating residual sulphur-containing compounds such as mercaptans.
[0018] The present invention describes a process that can reduce the total sulphur content of hydrocarbon cuts and preferably FCC gasoline cuts without losing the gasoline yield and minimizing the reduction in octane number.

Problems solved by technology

However, that process suffers from the major disadvantage of causing a very large drop in the octane number of the cut due to hydrogenation or saturation of a major portion or even all of the olefins under the hydrotreatment conditions.
The use of more selective catalysts may, however, when degrees of desulphurizing close to 100% are desired, limit olefin hydrogenation or allow the formation of recombination mercaptans.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

Preparation of Catalysts

[0062] The catalysts were prepared using the same method. The synthesis protocol consisted of dry impregnating a solution of ammonium heptamolybdate and cobalt nitrate, the volume of the aqueous solution containing the metallic precursors being equal to the water take-up volume (WTV) corresponding to the mass of support to be impregnated.

[0063] The concentrations of precursors in the solution were adjusted to deposit the desired amounts by weight of metallic oxides onto the support. The solid was left to mature at ambient temperature for 12 hours, then dried at −120° C. for 12 hours. Finally, the solid was calcined at 500° C. for two hours in a stream of air (1 l / h / g). The alumina supports used were industrial supports provided by Axens with the characteristics shown in Table 1 below.

TABLE 1characteristics of industrial alumina supportsSupportShapeSBET (m2 / g)*Vp (Hg)** cc / gαBeads 1.4-2.8 mm1401.10βBeads 1.4-2.8 mm801.09γBeads 1.4-2.8 mm321.06δBeads 1.4-2....

example 2

Evaluation of Performances of Catalysts A and D

[0069] In this example, the performances of catalysts A (according to the invention) and D (comparative) were compared in selective HDS of a sulphur-containing FCC gasoline with the characteristics shown in Table 3 below.

TABLE 3characteristics of FCC n° 1 gasolineTotal sulphur (ppm)970Olefins (weight %)35.7Aromatics (weight %)27.6ASTM distillation: IP 37° C.EP215° C.

[0070] The test conditions were as follows: P 2.7 MPa relative, HSV=4 h−1, H2 / feed=360 normal litres per litre (nl / l), T=250-280° C. Each operating condition was maintained over the time required to stabilize the catalyst both as regards hydrogenating activity and desulphurizing activity (typically 24 to 48 hours). The results obtained for catalysts A and D are shown in Table 4 below.

TABLE 4performances of catalysts A and D fordesulphurizing FCC n° 1 gasolineCatalyst ACatalyst DT (° C.)250260270250260Stotal1601309013065HDS / %83.586.690.786.693.3Olefins, % by26.726.125.52...

example 3

Evaluation of Performances of Catalysts A and B

[0072] In this example, catalysts A (according to the invention) and B (comparative) were evaluated using FCC n° 2 gasoline which contained less sulphur than FCC n° 1 gasoline, and which had the characteristics shown in Table 5 below.

TABLE 5characteristics of FCC n° 2 gasolineTotal sulphur (ppm)450Olefins (weight %)33.5Aromatics (weight %)28.2ASTM distillation: IP  −5° C.EP252° C.

[0073] The test conditions were as follows: P=1.5 MPa relative, HSV=5 h−1, H2 / feed=360 Nl / l, T=270-280° C. Each operating condition was maintained over the time required to stabilize the catalyst both as regards hydrogenating activity and desulphurizing activity (typically 24 to 48 hours). The results obtained for catalysts A and B are shown in Table 6 below.

TABLE 6performances of catalysts A and B for desulphurizing FCC n° 2 gasolineCatalyst ACatalyst BT (° C.)270280270280Stotal96469254HDS / %78.789.879.588.0Olefins, % by29.726.330.127.5weightHDO / %11.321.51...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

No PUM Login to View More

Abstract

A novel process is described which allows selective hydrodesulphurizing gasoline cuts containing sulphur-containing compounds and olefins. The process employs a catalyst comprising a support selected, for example, from refractory oxides such as aluminas, silicas, silica-aluminas or magnesia, used alone or as a mixture, a group VI metal, preferably Mo or W which may or may not be promoted by a group VIII metal, Co or Ni. The catalyst is characterized by a mean pore diameter of more than 22 nm. The process may comprise one or more steps.

Description

[0001] The present invention relates to a desulphurization process employing a catalyst containing at least one support, and an active phase comprising a metal, for example. The process allows hydrodesulphurizing gasoline, more particularly gasoline from a catalytic cracking process (fluid catalytic cracking, FCC). [0002] The production of reformulated gasoline satisfying new environmental regulations primarily necessitates substantially reducing their sulphur content. Current and future environmental regulations within the European community require refiners to reduce the sulphur content in the gasoline pool to values of 50 ppm or less by 2005 and 10 ppm by 1 Jan. 2009. The feed to be treated is generally a gasoline cut containing sulphur, such as a cut from coking, visbreaking, steam cracking or catalytic cracking (FCC). That feed is preferably constituted by a gasoline cut derived from a catalytic cracking unit with a typical boiling point range which extends from that of hydroca...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
IPC IPC(8): C10G45/04C10G45/08
CPCC10G2300/202C10G45/08C10G2300/1044C10G45/04C10G2400/02C10G45/06
Inventor BOUCHY, CHRISTOPHEMARCHAL, NATHALIEPICARD, FLORENT
Owner INST FR DU PETROLE