Process for hydrodesulphurizing gasoline employing a catalyst with controlled porosity
a hydrodesulphurizing gasoline and catalyst technology, applied in the field of desulphurization process, can solve the problems of limiting olefin hydrogenation, allowing the formation of recombination mercaptans, large drop in octane number of cut, etc., and achieves the effect of reducing the total sulphur content, minimizing the reduction in octane number, and reducing the yield of gasolin
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Benefits of technology
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Examples
example 1
Preparation of Catalysts
[0062] The catalysts were prepared using the same method. The synthesis protocol consisted of dry impregnating a solution of ammonium heptamolybdate and cobalt nitrate, the volume of the aqueous solution containing the metallic precursors being equal to the water take-up volume (WTV) corresponding to the mass of support to be impregnated.
[0063] The concentrations of precursors in the solution were adjusted to deposit the desired amounts by weight of metallic oxides onto the support. The solid was left to mature at ambient temperature for 12 hours, then dried at −120° C. for 12 hours. Finally, the solid was calcined at 500° C. for two hours in a stream of air (1 l / h / g). The alumina supports used were industrial supports provided by Axens with the characteristics shown in Table 1 below.
TABLE 1characteristics of industrial alumina supportsSupportShapeSBET (m2 / g)*Vp (Hg)** cc / gαBeads 1.4-2.8 mm1401.10βBeads 1.4-2.8 mm801.09γBeads 1.4-2.8 mm321.06δBeads 1.4-2....
example 2
Evaluation of Performances of Catalysts A and D
[0069] In this example, the performances of catalysts A (according to the invention) and D (comparative) were compared in selective HDS of a sulphur-containing FCC gasoline with the characteristics shown in Table 3 below.
TABLE 3characteristics of FCC n° 1 gasolineTotal sulphur (ppm)970Olefins (weight %)35.7Aromatics (weight %)27.6ASTM distillation: IP 37° C.EP215° C.
[0070] The test conditions were as follows: P 2.7 MPa relative, HSV=4 h−1, H2 / feed=360 normal litres per litre (nl / l), T=250-280° C. Each operating condition was maintained over the time required to stabilize the catalyst both as regards hydrogenating activity and desulphurizing activity (typically 24 to 48 hours). The results obtained for catalysts A and D are shown in Table 4 below.
TABLE 4performances of catalysts A and D fordesulphurizing FCC n° 1 gasolineCatalyst ACatalyst DT (° C.)250260270250260Stotal1601309013065HDS / %83.586.690.786.693.3Olefins, % by26.726.125.52...
example 3
Evaluation of Performances of Catalysts A and B
[0072] In this example, catalysts A (according to the invention) and B (comparative) were evaluated using FCC n° 2 gasoline which contained less sulphur than FCC n° 1 gasoline, and which had the characteristics shown in Table 5 below.
TABLE 5characteristics of FCC n° 2 gasolineTotal sulphur (ppm)450Olefins (weight %)33.5Aromatics (weight %)28.2ASTM distillation: IP −5° C.EP252° C.
[0073] The test conditions were as follows: P=1.5 MPa relative, HSV=5 h−1, H2 / feed=360 Nl / l, T=270-280° C. Each operating condition was maintained over the time required to stabilize the catalyst both as regards hydrogenating activity and desulphurizing activity (typically 24 to 48 hours). The results obtained for catalysts A and B are shown in Table 6 below.
TABLE 6performances of catalysts A and B for desulphurizing FCC n° 2 gasolineCatalyst ACatalyst BT (° C.)270280270280Stotal96469254HDS / %78.789.879.588.0Olefins, % by29.726.330.127.5weightHDO / %11.321.51...
PUM
Login to View More Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More