Such pumps are rather complex, having nine parts or more and involve the use of one-way ball valves, various springs, sliding pistons, sealing elements and related
engineering elements that require complex tooling and
assembly.
They also have a size limitation as it becomes difficult to maintain proper dimensional tolerance when size increases; likewise,
miniaturization is limited due to the large number of components.
They also have design restrictions that limit their esthetics and reduce design creativity by being limited to cylindrical shapes for their main body and being rather bulky.
However, such pumps present
assembly challenges for
mass-production as the flexible parts tend to deform during assembly which raises positioning issues and may result in unacceptable levels of defective parts, especially when assembly involves groves, annular rings or sliding seals, and tight fitting is required for proper sealing.
They also present reliability issues as it can be difficult to get a sealing connection between the flexible components and the rigid components.
Furthermore, most pumps with flexible walls tend to dispense fluid when sufficient
positive pressure is applied to the inlet port of the pump which may occur upon sufficient temperature change causing a substantial increase of the air pressure inside a container, especially when the fluid inside the container is volatile.
Such spontaneous fluid dispensing without user intervention is highly undesirable.
Considering the prior art, a few patents disclose dispensing pumps that can be made with as few as two components: a rigid pump base and an elastomeric component forming a pump body, and most have spontaneous dispensing issues and present
mass-production challenges as the requirement for tight fitting and rather complex geometry of a flexible part and a rigid part greatly complicates automated assembly.
Such setting requires a dual compartment and raises reliability and assembly issues.U.S. Pat. No. 3,752,366 discloses a two-piece suction pump with a deformable member, having an annular groove and an annular ring in sealing engagement to a cap member.U.S. Pat. No. 3,820,689 discloses an elastomeric pump with a rigid base member and an elastomeric upper member having a dome-shaped part and an extending elongated lip or flat member.
There are some problems with this type of design: for example, pressure applied to the pump will tend to peel off the “integral resilient upper member” from the “base member”, whether it is mechanically bound (with a grove for instance) or glued (the method favored by the patent).
Also, automated assembly of such a pump in a
production line may be very difficult to accomplish in practice.U.S. Pat. No. 6,755,327 teaches a complex pump using a sliding seal.
This can be problematic.
Also, a “stationary end sealed to the pump base about the inlet passageway” may raise leakage issues.U.S. Pat. No. 6,910,603 also teaches a fairly complicated pump.
The “annular barrier seal (23) in
rubbing contact between the upper (10) and lower (11) components” may not be reliable and may be prone to leakage because of the length of the seal is the entire perimeter.