Post anchoring devices and methods

Abstract

A post anchoring device for anchoring posts used in fence, deck, balcony and railing applications to a surface, the device comprising a base member capable of being connected to the surface, and an elongate, preferably cylindrical, tubular member having a base end and a terminal end, the base end being connected to the base member and the terminal end being remote from the base member such that the post may be impaled upon the tubular member by a user. The walls of the tubular member at the terminal end may be beveled to provide a cutting edge for cutting into the post to facilitate the impalement of the post. The base member may include a peripheral flange with a peripheral edge for abutting the end of the post thereby defining a cavity in which fasteners or other hardware may be concealed from sight for an aesthetically pleasing result.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0001]1. Field of the Invention[0002]The invention relates to fastening systems and methods used for securing posts and the like to mounting surfaces, and more particularly to post anchoring devices and methods for anchoring wood, fiber or other synthetic composite material posts used in fence, deck, balcony and railing applications to wooden, concrete, fiberglass, vinyl or other surfaces.[0003]2. Description of the Related Art[0004]There is a need to provide a mechanism by which posts can be secured to generally horizontal surfaces in such a way as to meet or exceed the functional requirements of strength and elimination of rot, and at the same time address aesthetic concerns surrounding the visibility and unsightly nature of the anchoring device and the fasteners used therein.[0005]Strength of design is particularly important for an unsupported run of railing or fence posts that separate areas differing in elevation. Equally important is the need to ensu...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

"The present invention provides an apparatus and method for anchoring a post to a surface in a way that is aesthetically pleasing and secure. The apparatus includes a base member and a tubular member with a terminal end. The tubular member is at least twice as long as it is wide and has a beveled edge for cutting into the post. The base member is attached to the surface and the tubular member is forced into the post to secure it. The method involves aligning the post with the tubular member and then securing the tubular member to the post using a bolt and nut. The invention offers an improved solution for mounting posts to surfaces."

Problems solved by technology

Alternatively, superior aesthetic solutions designed to conceal fasteners have heretofore possessed lower strength characteristics and often require unsightly supporting triangular brackets to stiffen the post to surface connection.

These types of brackets are functional only and not aesthetically pleasing.

While functional, these devices are not aesthetically appealing.

While the Timko device provides a stiff, secure union between post and mounting surface, it is attached to the outside of the post and has numerous visible fasteners that detract from the overall aesthetical appearance.

While the Nicholas device conceals the fasteners, boring is required in both the post and the floor surface.

It is also unsuitable for outdoor applications because the base of the post would be in direct contact with the mounting surface and subject to moisture and water damage.

Although the device does conceal all fasteners, it is not suitable for mounting on to surfaces that are not as hard as concrete, such as wood, because the base is secured by a wedge bolt that must be placed into a hole bored into concrete or like material.

This device hides all fasteners, but without bracing, the unsupported newel posts are wobbly because the strength of the post to base connection is dependent upon the integrity of the narrow lag screw.

The inherently narrow cross sectional dimensions of the lag screw necessarily means that it can never provide the degree of stiffness that is ultimately required for applications outside of a unitary railing system.

In addition, a challenge exists for meeting building code requirements for wood posts because the physical properties of wood, such as specific gravity, grain pattern, moisture content and knot locations vary greatly.

As a result of this range of variability among wood species, it is not sufficient that a wood guardrail merely meet the lower design loads specified in the building code.

However even if a single post can not provide load resistance of 500 lbs it does not necessarily mean that a guardrail system using such a post would fail to meet the building code standards.

Nonetheless, single posts rather than complete post and rail systems are often subjected to this test load as a worst case scenario because it stands to reason that if a single post can with stand such a load, the complete railing system will provide greater resistance—subject of course to rail span limits based on maximum distributive loads created between directional changes.

And none of the methods to which the academics refer as being able to meet the building codes are surface mounted connections between post and deck.

However the aesthetic appearance of a post that is secured to the outside band board does not appeal to many homeowners and architects or builders.

The less desirable aspects of joist connected posts are: decking boards must be notched if posts are set inside the deck framing; when posts are attached to the outside face of deck framing they appear less attractive and require two adjacent posts at exterior corners; railing sections between posts are located beyond the vertical plane of the deck's perimeter which is unappealing and creates a potentially larger gap between the bottom rail and the decking surface; alternatively railing sections can be attached to the inside face of the posts but this creates a crude aesthetic appearance; and wood to wood contact leaves posts and joists vulnerable to water damage in areas with wetter climates leading to faster deterioration and higher maintenance costs.

Surface mounted anchors will almost always offer lower top end lateral load resistance than joist mounted posts, and finding ways to maximize their strength while maintaining their intrinsic aesthetic appeal remained a great challenge in this field of art.

They are large, bulky and unsightly apparatuses which have low aesthetic value.

As well, they do not necessarily pass the building code and so their use is most often confined to non-building code applications.

Images