The presence of these reduced sulfur species in gas mixtures adversely impacts processes designed to extract energy or convert these gas mixtures into value-added chemicals.
The Selexol™ sulfur removal process is very selective for H2S, but struggles to remove other sulfur species, particularly COS.
With a Selexol™-based desulfurization process, an additional preprocessing step, to convert the COS into H2S via a
hydrolysis reaction, may be required, resulting in additional capital and operating costs for removal of sulfur species besides H2S.
Not all
solvent-based desulfurization processes have this issue, but most do.
The cost associated with continuously replenishing this caustic is a significant
operating cost, which increases proportionally to the concentration of reduced sulfur species.
In addition, separation and conversion of the captured sulfur species into a suitable form that is acceptable for disposal requires significant additional
processing.
These disadvantages make caustic wash cost prohibitive when the sulfur concentration in the gas mixture is high.
These disadvantages also reduce commercial applications for caustic washing to a few niche applications for which better alternative technologies are not available.
However, the use of this process for
syngas is limited due to highly flammable nature of the
syngas components, namely H2 and CO.
Furthermore, this process suffers from a number of technical issues, including degradation of chelating agents, high chemical make-up costs, formation of sulfur oxo-anions, and plugging of the absorber due to
salt formation.
For small quantities of sulfur removal , typically below 5
ton / day, this process is not cost-competitive.
For gas mixtures comprising sulfur in a range of from about 5 ppmv to about 5,000 ppmv, existing commercial sulfur removal processes generally are not very cost-effective, a circumstance which creates a significant economic penalty for utilization of these gas mixtures, particularly to produce value-added chemicals and fuels.
However, for straight-run fractions such as straight run
naphtha, which have lower sulfur concentrations, dedicated caustic wash systems are frequently used, because the H2S in this process
stream is relatively small and the value of the product derived can tolerate higher operating costs associated with continuous consumption of caustic solution.
In addition, the caustic wash systems are problematic and challenging for operators to operate and maintain, which escalates the already high operating costs, as well as producing substantial amounts of
spent caustic solution that must be safely disposed of In some instances, the H2S-containing H2
stream from the
hydrodesulfurization unit is recycled without any H2S removal, except for purging it from the recycle loop to maintain a desired H2S concentration at the inlet of the
hydrodesulfurization reactor.
This is typically achieved by purging part of the recycle stream resulting in higher than necessary
operating cost for
hydrogen consumption, which adversely and unacceptably affects the overall profitability of the process facility.
Because of the small concentrations of sulfur in these
tail gas streams, the high level of sulfur removal required, and the overall small amount of sulfur being treated,
solvent-based processes are complex and cost-prohibitive.
Although regeneration reactions can be proposed for almost any
metal oxide /
metal sulfide combination, the key
differentiator for the regenerable sorbent from the generic sulfur guard
bed sorbent is its ability to be regenerated numerous times. If a sorbent cannot be effectively regenerated more than 50 times without deteriorating desulfurization and regeneration performance, then the sorbent will not be cost-effective in comparison to a generic sulfur guard
bed sorbent that is non-regenerable in character, and is intended to be utilized without regeneration until the sorbent is loaded to a final or predetermined extent, following which the guard
bed is removed for disposal, and replaced by a fresh guard bed.
High
porosity generally provides faster
kinetics for the desulfurization reaction; it however leads to poor crush strength and hence should be carefully controlled to get the proper balance of
kinetics and crush strength.
Thermal and chemical
cycling during the desulfurization and regeneration cycles may lead to
sintering and changes in the physical properties that can have an
adverse effect on sorbent performance.
Although many regenerable metal
oxide sorbent have been proposed and tested at
laboratory scale,
adaptation of the lab-scale production processes into commercial processes that can produce the sorbent at a suitable cost for commercial application of a fixed-bed regenerable sorbent process has not been achieved in practice for many of these sorbents.
The
impact of this sulfur during use of sulfur-laden
hydrocarbon-based fuels include mechanical problems associated with
corrosion of downstream
process equipment, detrimental poisoning of catalysts, and / or environmental issues associated with the release of SOx to the environment.
For low concentrations of H2S, typically <1 ppm, the cost of replacing the sorbent, when all or a major amount of the metal oxide has been converted to a sulfide, is an acceptable operating expense.
When the H2S concentration substantially exceeds 1 ppm, the cost of replacing the sorbent, when the metal oxide has been converted to metal sulfide, becomes prohibitive.
However, sufficient amounts of the diluents are not usually readily available at low enough cost to support generation of a cost-effective oxidizing mixture for regeneration.
As for diluting air to generate the regeneration gas, the volumetric flow of these inerts available at a
plant is limited.