Flame retardant thermoplastic composition and articles comprising the same
A thermoplastic composition, hydroxide technology, applied in conductors, electrical components, circuits, etc., can solve problems such as adverse effects on physical properties
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1-9
[0160] Combining thermoplastic compositions with RDP, MPP and Mg(OH) 2 Melt blended in the amounts shown in Table 2, the thermoplastic composition comprised 38.5% by weight PPE, 26.9% by weight SEBS I, 25.6% by weight LLDPE, and 9.0% by weight polybutene, based on the total weight of the thermoplastic material. RDP, MPP and Mg(OH) 2 The amounts of are shown in parts / 100 parts thermoplastic composition (PPE+SEBS I+LLDPE+polybutene). The compositions were molded into 3.2mm bars for flammability testing. The flammability test was performed according to the procedure of the Underwriter's Laboratory Bulletin 94 entitled "Tests for Flammability of Plastic Materials, UL94". Each extinguished strip was ignited twice. According to this protocol, the material is classified as HB, V0, V1 or V2 based on the test results obtained for 5 samples. The individual standards for these flammability classifications of UL94 are briefly described below:
[0161] HB: For a 5 inch sample, positio...
Embodiment 10-15
[0171] Based on thermoplastic composition with BTPP, RDP, MPP and Mg(OH) 2 Melt blended in the amounts shown in Table 3, the thermoplastic composition comprised 42.6% by weight PPE, 32.0% by weight SEBS I, 21.4% by weight LLDPE, and 4.0% by weight polybutene, based on the total weight of the thermoplastic material. The amounts of BTPP, RDP, MPP and Mg(OH)2 are shown in parts per hundred parts of thermoplastic composition (PPE+SEBSI+LLDPE+polybutene). The compositions were molded into 3.2 mm bars for the flammability test and tested as described in Examples 1-9.
[0172] table 3
[0173] Example BTPP RDP MPP Mg(OH) 2 burn time UL94 rating 10 3.9 19.3 11.4 7.7 5.2 V0 11 0 19.3 11.4 7.7 17.4 V1 12 0 24.4 12.8 7.7 2.9 V0 13 0 25.7 7.7 7.7 1.9 V0 14 6.4 19.3 11.4 11.4 24.2 V1 15 10.3 15.4 7.7 10.3 8.8 V0
[017...
Embodiment 16-19
[0176] 26% by weight of PPE, 25% by weight of SEBS I, 15.0% by weight of polyethylene copolymer (as shown in Table 4) and 2% by weight of polybutene of the total weight of the composition were mixed with BTPP in the amount shown in Table 4 , RDP, MPP and Mg(OH) 2 Melt mixing. The amounts of BTPP, RDP, MPP and Mg(OH)2 are shown in weight percent of the total weight of the composition. The compositions were molded into 2.0 mm bars for the flammability test and tested as described in Examples 1-9. In Example 19, one out of ten burns resulted in dripping at 20 seconds, giving a V2 rating.
[0177] Table 4
[0178]
[0179] Examples 16-19 illustrate that compositions containing significant amounts of polyolefin and comprising various polyethylene copolymers can achieve a V2 rating or better using a flame retardant additive composition.
PUM
Property | Measurement | Unit |
---|---|---|
flexural modulus | aaaaa | aaaaa |
flexural modulus | aaaaa | aaaaa |
diameter | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information

- R&D
- Intellectual Property
- Life Sciences
- Materials
- Tech Scout
- Unparalleled Data Quality
- Higher Quality Content
- 60% Fewer Hallucinations
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.
© 2025 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com