Continuous process for preparing polymers

Inactive Publication Date: 2001-12-13
ROHM & HAAS CO
View PDF0 Cites 2 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

0014] One advantage to using the Versator to degas is that it may also be used as a premixer to emulsify the feed streams when an emulsion polymerization is being carried out. The monomer emulsion formed by the degassed aqueous and monomer streams is very stable.
0015] The channels may be constructed of any material suitable for forming into the desired shape and capable of providing sufficient heat transfer when expos

Problems solved by technology

Such processes are susceptible to various degrees to polymer build-up or fouling on the reactor surfaces.
Polymer fouling results in the need to shut the reactors d

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

Example

Example 1

[0032] A monomer mixture (46% butyl acrylate, 53% methyl methacrylate, 1% methacrylic acid) was fed at 58.5 g / min from a 3.6 L tank to an evacuated premixer (Cornell Model D-8 Versator with a vacuum of 55.9 mm(22 in) water). An aqueous mixture (1.4% anionic surfactant) was fed at 11.4 g / min from a 7.6 L tank to the pre-mixer. The pre-mixer was set to a speed such that a stable monomer emulsion was produced. A 20 L aqueous feed tank was used to feed hot DI water to the front of the process. A 10% ammonium persulfate catalyst solution was prepared. The solution was mixed well and fed to the catalyst feed tank. A 1.2% aqueous ammonia / 13.8% sodium laurel sulfate buffer solution was prepared. The solution was mixed well and fed to the buffer feed tank. The aqueous feeds were fed through 18 feet of peroxide cured gas permeable tubing coiled in an evacuated chamber at 61.0 mm(24 in) water. The aqueous catalyst feed tanks were sparged with N2. The buffer feed tank was swept with N2...

Example

Example 2

[0041] A monomer mixture (46% butyl acrylate, 53% methyl methacrylate, 1% methacrylic acid) was fed at 58.5 g / min from a 3.6 L tank to an evacuated premixer (Cornell Model D-8 Versator with a vacuum of 55.9 mm (22 in) water). An aqueous mixture (1.4% anionic surfactant) was fed at 11.4 g / min from a 7.6 L tank to the pre-mixer. The pre-mixer was set to a speed such that a stable monomer emulsion was produced. A 20 L aqueous feed tank was used to feed hot DI water to the front of the process. A 10% ammonium persulfate catalyst solution was prepared. The solution was mixed well and fed to the catalyst feed tank. A 1.2% aqueous ammonia / 13.8% sodium laurel sulfate buffer solution was prepared. The solution was mixed well and fed to the buffer feed tank. The aqueous feeds were fed through 18 feet of peroxide cured gas permeable tubing coiled in an evacuated chamber at 61.0 mm (24 in) water. The aqueous tanks were sparged with Helium. The buffer feed and catalyst tanks were swept ...

Example

Example 3

[0045] A monomer mixture (46% butyl acrylate, 53% methyl methacrylate, 1% methacrylic acid) was fed at 58.5 g / min from a 3.6 L tank to an evacuated premixer (Cornell Model D-8 Versator with a vacuum of 55.9 mm (22 in) water). An aqueous mixture (1.4% anionic surfactant) was fed at 11.4 g / min from a 7.6 L tank to the pre-mixer. The pre-mixer was set to a speed such that a stable monomer emulsion was produced. A 20 L aqueous feed tank was used to feed hot DI water to the front of the process. A 10% ammonium persulfate catalyst solution was prepared. The solution was mixed well and fed to the catalyst feed tank. A 1.2% aqueous ammonia / 13.8% sodium laurel sulfate buffer solution was prepared. The solution was mixed well and fed to the buffer feed tank. The aqueous feeds were fed through 18 feet of peroxide cured gas permeable tubing coiled in an evacuated chamber at 24" water. The aqueous, catalyst feed tanks were sparged with N2. The buffer feed tank was swept with N2.

[0046] D...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
Solubility (mass)aaaaaaaaaa
Fouling propertiesaaaaaaaaaa
Login to view more

Abstract

A continuous process for preparing polymers, preferably emulsion polymers, with minimal fouling of the reactor is provided. The process is effected in a reactor which does not contain a gas phase, optionally by reducing the gas content of the reaction mixture.

Description

[0001] This invention relates to a continuous process for preparing polymers and a method for the reduction of polymer fouling on reactor surfaces, especially in a continuous process for preparing emulsion polymers.[0002] Polymers are typically prepared in batch, semi-continuous, or continuous processes. Such processes are susceptible to various degrees to polymer build-up or fouling on the reactor surfaces. Polymer fouling results in the need to shut the reactors down and clean the reactor surfaces which reduces available production time and may, for certain reactor geometries such as tubular reactors, be highly inconvenient.[0003] European Patent Application 926 161 A discloses a continuous process for preparing polymers in a reactor having a non-cylindrical channel which provides low levels of fouling. Even lower levels of fouling are desired.[0004] "Effects of Dissolved Gas on Emulsions, Emulsion Polymerization, and Surfactant Aggregation" by M. E. Karaman, et al. J. Phys. Chem,...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to view more
IPC IPC(8): C08F2/00C08F2/22
CPCC08F2/22Y10S526/918
Inventor FITZWATER, SUSAN JANEMCFADDEN, DAWN MARIE
Owner ROHM & HAAS CO
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Try Eureka
PatSnap group products