Simultaneous assay of target and target-drug binding

Inactive Publication Date: 2005-12-01
ESOTERIX
View PDF4 Cites 13 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0015] The invention provides quantitative cell-based measurements of experimental drugs designed to bind to very specific protein “targets.” It allows real time detection of target level and drug-bound target level, thus simplifying and improving on the prior art methods of studying drug kinetics.
[0021] A great many conjugated antibodies are commercially available and these can easily be screened to identify antibody pairs with the requisite binding characteristics (Total and Free-Site binding). Those antibodies that are not conjugated can easily be conjugated with an appropriate dye using one of the many available conjugation kits. Commercial suppliers will also provide custom antibodies on demand.
[0024] An alternative application of this method is for the analysis of free drug in plasma or serum of subjects exposed to various drug dosage regimens. Data from this assay is useful in pharmocokinetic (PK) modeling of functional drug activity. The PK application utilizes a cell line that constitutively expresses the receptor protein target to which the drug binds. Incubation of the cell line with a standard range of drug concentrations followed by staining of the cells with fluorochrome-conjugated drug sensitive monoclonal antibodies allows for the construction of a very specific standard curve of antibody fluorescence as it inversely relates to drug concentration. Subsequent to the construction of the standard curve, it is possible to derive the amount of drug in specimens of unknown concentration by extrapolation of the degree of drug-induced inhibition of antibody fluorescence to drug concentration as defined by the standard curve.

Problems solved by technology

Previous methods of measuring drug activity have been laborious and complex.
However, protein purification and multiple assays make such methods laborious and not conducive to the high throughput generation of data.
Further, purified proteins by definition are outside their normal body environment, and the changes in environment can complicate or change the way a protein behaves.
This can result in misleading or incomplete information about a drug's activity and kinetics.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Simultaneous assay of target and target-drug binding
  • Simultaneous assay of target and target-drug binding
  • Simultaneous assay of target and target-drug binding

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

Antibody Optimization

[0034] The following method was employed to validate the method of the invention using the targets and antibodies described in Table 2, below. However, it can be applied to any novel combinations of antibodies to find suitable antibody pairs useful for any target-drug combinations of interest.

[0035] Commercially available conjugated antibodies against various antigens (generically called AgX) were identified and ordered for evaluation in the method of the invention. Non-conjugated, purified antibodies as well as proprietary pharmaceutical grade antibodies can also be obtained for evaluation and potential custom conjugation.

[0036] All anti-AgX antibodies against were evaluated in triplicate in the presence and absence of saturating concentrations of the appropriate drug (in each instance, the drug is specific for a single epitope on the protein AgX) by performing individual multi-point two-fold serial dilutions of each antibody. Additional cell subtype specifi...

example 2

Additional Antibody Pairs

[0041] Additional antibody pairs that can be used in the general method of the invention for particular target and drug combinations can be identified using the method described generally in Example 1. Some possible combinations are listed in Table 3. However, the combinations are unlimited and additional combinations can identified by searching MEDLINE, ATCC or the web.

TABLE 3Additional Target-Drug Combinations and Antibody PairsTargetDrugAntibodiesCD20Rituximab,PRO70769, Rituximab, BexxarBexxar(Tositumomab), B1, Immu-106,Ibritumomab, HI47, L27CD52Campath-1HCampath-1H(Alemtuzumab)CD33In DevelopmentHB-10306, Mab 251, M195,huM195, PC251, L4F3CD4In DevelopmentOKT4, TNX-355, HuMax-CD4,GK1.5, W3 / 25, YTS177.9,ORTHOCLONE OKTcdr4aCD3In DevelopmentHB231, HB10166, UCHT1, PS1,OKT3,CD14In DevelopmentHB-247, HB-246, UCHM-1, IC14,M5E2, MφP9CD30In DevelopmentcAC10-vcMMAE, SGN-30, Ki-1,K0145-3, HSR-4, BER-H2HLA-DrHu1D10Hu1D10, L243, BRA30, 1DO9C3,TNB-211, 1D10, LN3,MAP ...

example 3

Flow Cytometry

[0042] Although the invention has been exemplified with respect to several antibody pair-drug combinations, as indicated in Table 2, only the data from a single study (CD11b) are presented herein for simplicity. These results are representative, although the details for each study will vary. The protocols described are also exemplary, but cell harvesting, antibody staining, fixation, and gating parameters should be (and were) optimized for each experiment.

[0043] General Protocol: For analysis of whole blood by flow cytometry, the following protocol was employed: 100 μl of whole blood was sterilely collected for each data point. For each sample, 2 ml of standard culture media plus or minus drug was added to the blood and the tubes vortexed briefly to mix. The samples were then incubated to allow drug binding for 1 hr at 37° C.

[0044] Next the cells were stained with the appropriate antibody or antibodies. A saturating amount (as determined in the titration evaluation ...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

PUM

No PUM Login to view more

Abstract

Whole cell, simultaneous target and drug-target assay using differentially labeled antibodies and flow cytometry. First antibody binds to total target and second antibody binds to the drug binding site of the target, thus drug binding will competitively inhibit the second antibody allowing for a competitive inhibition assay of drug-target binding. The assay allows for whole cell analysis and even analysis of mixed populations of cells, yet provides detailed kinetic assessment of drug activity.

Description

PRIOR RELATED APPLICATIONS [0001] This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60 / 573,783 filed May 24, 2004.FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH STATEMENT [0002] Not applicable. FIELD OF THE INVENTION [0003] The invention relates to a new cell based method of detecting or measuring drug activity, by simultaneously measuring target and target-drug combinations by flow cytometry. The method uses a pair of antibodies, one that is drug insensitive and will indicate total target level regardless of whether drug is present or not. The second is drug sensitive and will not bind to target at the same time that drug is bound to target. The drug and second antibody thus compete for the same or overlapping binding sites. Both antibodies can be simultaneously quantified when differentially labeled. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0004] Previous methods of measuring drug activity have been laborious and complex. Typically, a drug target (the protein to which a drug binds in orde...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to view more
IPC IPC(8): G01N33/50G01N33/53G01N33/567G01N33/68
CPCG01N33/5091G01N33/6854G01N33/5008G01N33/6863Y10T436/101666G01N33/94G01N2333/70514G01N2333/70553G01N2333/70596G01N33/6872G01N2333/7158
Inventor PURVIS, NORMAN B.STELZER, GREGORY T.
Owner ESOTERIX
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Try Eureka
PatSnap group products