Surface treatment of magnesium and its alloys

a surface treatment and magnesium technology, applied in the direction of anodisation, phosphatisation, chromatisation, etc., can solve the problems of reducing the surface appearance of the surface, obscuring the desired surface finish, and unable to brighten nor polish the metal

Inactive Publication Date: 2006-06-22
KERONITE INT LTD
View PDF7 Cites 15 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0036] Preferably, said inorganic material coating or sealer is substantially transparent and / or substantially provides corrosion protection and / or at least some protection from mechanically induced damage.

Problems solved by technology

In its usual fabricated forms the surface appearance is relatively dull and obscured by surface oxidation products or other compounds.
Owing to the reactivity of magnesium, post-treatments are generally necessary to passivate the surface, and conventionally the desired surface finish is lost during this step.
Mostly these processes neither brighten nor polish the metal.
While in many applications this may be a desirable finish in itself, this is not regarded as surface polishing or brightening.
However, these techniques are not applicable to magnesium alloys due to their different chemistry.
Although, many brightening methods have been known for a long time, little work has been made to accommodate magnesium and its alloys.
Two other problems exist that make the processing of magnesium and magnesium alloys difficult.
Firstly, many commercial alloy articles (especially die cast articles) exhibit significant amounts of segregation both of the surface and in the interior of the article.
This together with commonly encountered casting defects produces a highly inhomogeneous surface which cannot be improved by conventional means.
Secondly, as magnesium is a highly reactive metal that forms a non-continuous oxide layer, for a viable bright surface finish to be attained the surface must be treated in a manner to prevent the oxide layer forming after surface brightening or polishing treatments.
Although the resulting plated article has a shiny, metallic appearance, this is due to the plated metal and could not be regarded as a system for brightening or polishing magnesium or magnesium alloy articles.
There are also profound disadvantages in plating other metals onto magnesium or magnesium alloy substrates including for example galvanic corrosion problems in corrosive environments, expense, processing difficulties in a plating process and high reject rates from most processes.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Surface treatment of magnesium and its alloys
  • Surface treatment of magnesium and its alloys
  • Surface treatment of magnesium and its alloys

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

[0097] A die cast plate, 140 mm×100 mm, 3 mm thick, of AM50 alloy, was brightened, using the following steps: [0098] 1. Degrease in CW25 at 70° C. for one minute [0099] 2. Rinse in water for approximately 30 seconds [0100] 3. Pre-etch in PE3 for 30 seconds [0101] 4. Rinse in water [0102] 5. Electropolish in EP3 solution in two stages—galvanic polish (no imposed AC voltage) for six minutes, followed by an imposed AC voltage of 5 VAC for 20 seconds. [0103] 6. Rinse in monopropylene glycol for 5 seconds [0104] 7. Wash in CW25 for 20 seconds at 70° C. [0105] 8. Rinse in water [0106] 9. Passivate, using potassium permanganate solution, PM1, for 10 seconds [0107] 10. Rinse in water [0108] 11. Dry using hot air

[0109] The result was a very bright finish, having a slight yellow tinge. The die cast structure was plainly visible.

example 2

[0110] A die cast plate of AZ91D alloy having the same dimensions as in example 1 above, was treated using the following processes: [0111] 1. Degrease in CW25, 70° C., for 1 minute [0112] 2. Rinse in water [0113] 3. Pre-etch in PE3 for 30 seconds [0114] 4. Rinse in water [0115] 5. Polish in EP3 solution for 5 minutes, using a galvanic polish (no AC voltage) [0116] 6. Rinse in monopropylene glycol for 5 seconds [0117] 7. Wash in CW25, 70° C. for 20 seconds [0118] 8. Rinse in water [0119] 9. Passivate using PC1 for 30 seconds [0120] 10. Rinse in water [0121] 11. Dry using hot air

[0122] The result was a metallic finish in which casting structures were visible.

example 3

[0123] A die cast plate of AM50 alloy, having the same dimensions as that in examples 1 and 2 above, was treated using the following processes: [0124] 1. Degrease in CW25 at 70° C. for 1 minute [0125] 2. Rinse in water [0126] 3. Pre-etch in PE3 for 30 seconds [0127] 4. Wash in CW25, 70° C. for 30 seconds [0128] 5. Rinse in water [0129] 6. Chemical blast in three steps —1 minute in CB2A solution followed by 7 minutes in CB1 solution and finally, an additional minute in CB2A solution [0130] 7. Wash in CW25, 70° C., 1 minute [0131] 8. Polish in EP3 solution in three steps—one minute using an imposed AC voltage of 5 VAC, 3 minutes without AC voltage, then an additional 20 seconds using an imposed AC voltage as before. [0132] 9. Rinse in monopropylene glycol for 5 seconds [0133] 10. Wash in CW25, 70° C. for 20 seconds [0134] 11. Rinse in water [0135] 12. Passivate in PM1 for ten seconds [0136] 13. Rinse in water [0137] 14. Dry using hot air

[0138] The result was a bright finish, with a h...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
current densityaaaaaaaaaa
thicknessaaaaaaaaaa
thickaaaaaaaaaa
Login to view more

Abstract

Methods of polishing and/or brightening surfaces of magnesium or magnesium alloy are disclosed. Polishing and/or brightening methods suitable to both high and low aluminium content magnesium articles are disclosed. In each of the methods, the surface is polished and then passivated. Using the disclosed methods it is possible to control aspects of the appearance of the surface to thereby, for example, obtain a bright and shiny surface to a magnesium or magnesium alloy article which is both stable and corrosion resistant. It is also possible to provide a predetermined texture to the surface using optional steps.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD [0001] The present invention relates to surface treatment of magnesium and its alloys and in particular, though not solely, this invention relates to providing a bright shiny and / or textured surface finish to magnesium or magnesium alloy. BACKGROUND ART [0002] Magnesium metal, either pure or in an alloy form, is a highly reactive metal. In its usual fabricated forms the surface appearance is relatively dull and obscured by surface oxidation products or other compounds. Accordingly, magnesium metal does not usually manifest a bright, shiny, metallic finish except when the article has been machined. Although a dull surface may not always be disadvantageous, it is often desirable to provide a bright or polished surface to magnesium for reasons of aesthetics or utility. Owing to the reactivity of magnesium, post-treatments are generally necessary to passivate the surface, and conventionally the desired surface finish is lost during this step. [0003] Conventional treatmen...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to view more
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): C23C22/78C23F3/02C23F3/03C25D11/30C25D11/36C25D11/38
CPCC23F3/02C23F3/03C25D11/30C25D11/38
Inventor MAWSTON, IAN GRANTPANOV, SERGUEI
Owner KERONITE INT LTD
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Try Eureka
PatSnap group products