This makes it hard to communicate with a
logging tool that is conveyed a significant distance along the borehole.
An autonomous
logging tool however is not normally capable of signalling correct deployment at its downhole location; nor is it usually capable of sending
log data to a surface location in real-time; nor may it normally receive complex control commands from a surface location.
These mud pulses however amount to very
narrow bandwidth, low bit-rate communications that are not at all suitable for conveying
log data in real-time.
Moreover the mud pulses require energy to generate and can be ambiguous due to their propagation over many thousands of feet of the borehole depth.
Mud pulse signalling therefore is often of little help in the controlling of logging tools and the
rapid acquisition of data.
As drilling a borehole takes significant time, typically days, slow data rates although a
disadvantage are useable in this application.
However one difficulty associated with
wireline logging tools is that it is not generally possible to maintain a connection during e.g. an LWD operation since the
wireline presents an obstacle to jointing of the
drill pipe at the surface.
Gathering data from the tool under such circumstances necessarily requires the movement of
drill pipe.
The downhole environment is usually extremely harsh, partly because of significant fluid pressures that exist and also because various chemicals present in boreholes are not compatible with the use of electrical signals for data and
power transmission.
This could be because the chemicals are for example chemically aggressive and thereby degrade connector terminals, or because they are electrically conducting or insulating in ways that can interfere with the performance of electrical and
electronic equipment exposed to them.
The damaging physical conditions in a downhole location make it
extremely hard to design a reliable, releasable connector that meets the multiple requirements set out above.
Many such connection designs cannot be “made” after being “broken” in a downhole situation as may occur when the
wireline is pulled away from the toolstring.
Wet connectors however suffer from numerous problems one of which is that if any borehole fluid becomes interposed between the terminals respectively of the male and female elements, undesirable short circuits, open circuits and other anomalies, depending on the character of the borehole fluid, may arise.
Certain wet connector designs include features the aim of which is to minimise the chance of borehole fluid ingress in this way but these features often are not successful.
As a result for example the anti-ingress features may make it less likely on
mating of the male and female connector elements that the terminals will contact one another in a satisfactory manner.
Moreover borehole fluids as indicated may be chemically aggressive,
abrasive and / or under very
high pressure.
These factors tend to make the anti-ingress features of the wet connectors fail prematurely.
Yet another problem associated with wet connectors is that they tend to occupy a large volume in the vicinity of the toolstring parts requiring connection.
This makes them unsuited for use in conjunction with mechanical latch arms of the kind that are often used for the temporary securing of parts of a toolstring, such as relatively uphole and downhole elements of a sonde
assembly, together.