A dual digital PCR method for the quantitative detection of fox-derived components
A digital, fox-sourced technology, applied in the field of dual digital PCR, can solve the problems of unseen quantitative detection methods
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
preparation example Construction
[0065] 1. Sample preparation and DNA template extraction: Take 25-30 g of the sample (meat, meat products or feed, etc.) and cut it into pieces, then use a tissue grinder to crush it. The crushing condition is 1800 rpm for 3 minutes. Weigh 20mg~50mg of the prepared sample into a 1.5mL centrifuge tube, and use the kit method to extract the sample DNA. The kit can be used: Animal Tissue Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (KuraboQuickGene DNA Extraction Kit DT-S), Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit ( Promega, A1120), PSS nucleic acid automatic extractor and other DNA extraction methods.
[0066] 2. Preparation and dispersion of reaction system
[0067] (1) The reaction system of ddPCR digital PCR is:
[0068] ddPCR (Droplet digital PCR, Droplet digital PCR) reaction system is 20 μL, and the components are as follows: 10 μL of 2×ddPCRTM master mix; 0.8 μL of each primer with a concentration of 10 μmol / μL, and a probe with a concentration of 10 μmol / μL 0.4 μL each, 2 μL DNA template, an...
Embodiment 1
[0102] Example 1 Verification of the Relative Qualitative Detection Limit of the Copy Number Concentration of Fox-derived Components
[0103] Samples for testing: Using genomic DNA from pigs, cattle, sheep, and chickens as a substrate, mix fox genomic DNA according to the copy number percentage to form a test DNA sample with a fox genomic DNA copy number percentage of 0.01%. Three parallel ddPCR and cdPCR experiments were carried out, and the obtained data are shown in figure 1 and figure 2 . The results showed that both ddPCR and cdPCR could be detected when the content of fox-derived components was 0.01%.
Embodiment 2
[0104] Example 2 Verification of the Relative Quantitative Detection Limit of the Copy Number Concentration of Fox-derived Components
[0105] Samples to be tested: In order to verify the quantitative detection limit of this method, pig, cattle, sheep, and chicken genomic DNA were used as substrates, and fox genomic DNA with copy number percentages of 0.1%, 1%, 10%, and 100% were mixed into it . Three parallel ddPCR and cdPCR experiments were carried out respectively, and the obtained experimental results are shown in image 3 and Figure 4 .
[0106] For fox genomic DNA samples with copy number percentages of 0.1%, 1%, 10% and 100%, the detection results on the ddPCR platform were 0.099%, 1.006%, 9.700% and 103.41%, respectively, and the three parallel The RSD value was between 1.07% and 6.28%, and the recovery rate was between 97.03% and 103.41%; the detection results on the cdPCR platform were 0.10%, 0.96%, 10.06% and 101.39%, respectively, and the RSD among the three pa...
PUM
| Property | Measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| recovery rate | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| recovery rate | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


