Zinc-based alloy shot and method for producing same
A manufacturing method and pellet technology, applied in manufacturing tools, metal processing equipment, abrasives, etc., can solve the problems of safety and environmental protection, and achieve high shot peening ability, long life, life and tensile strength. improved effect
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment
[0139] Manufactured from Al, Mg, Cu, and Zn base metal weighed so as to have the ratios shown in Table 1 below, through the aforementioned steps S01 to S06 (type A) or steps S11 to S14 (type B). Zinc-based alloy pellets.
[0140] Type A: a zinc-based alloy produced in steps S01 to S06 of the above-mentioned production method and classified so that the average particle diameter is 0.8 mm and the aforementioned a / b is 1.0 to 1.3.
[0141] Type B: Zinc-based alloy pellets with a wire rod diameter of 0.8 mm produced through steps S11 to S14.
[0142] The following evaluation tests were performed on these zinc-based alloy pellets.
[0143] 100 kg of zinc-based alloy pellets were charged into a shot blasting machine (DZB type: manufactured by Shinto Kogyo Co., Ltd.), and a die-casting part made of aluminum alloy (surface hardness: 100HV) was blasted to evaluate performance. It should be noted that the projection velocity of the zinc-based alloy pellets was 53 m / s.
[0144] The ev...
Embodiment 8
[0165] Example 8 has the same composition as Example 7, but is the result of changing the projection time in the aforementioned hardness adjustment step S06. The hardness of the zinc-based alloy pellets representing type A can be adjusted through the hardness adjustment step S06.
[0166]
[0167] In any of the types of zinc-based alloy pellets, Examples 1 to 16, in which the addition of Al is 0.05 to 2.0% and the addition of Mg is in the range of 0.001 to 0.20%, are all Δ above evaluation. Furthermore, when Cu was added in a small amount in the range of 0.0002 to 0.01%, the evaluation was Δ or higher under any conditions. Here, the △ evaluation is inferior to the ○ evaluation, but there is no practical problem, suggesting that the ○ evaluation or higher can be obtained by optimizing the projection conditions (projection speed, particle size, etc.). Therefore, it turns out that in Examples 1-14, evaluation of the consumption amount was favorable.
[0168] All of Comparati...
PUM
| Property | Measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Vickers hardness | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| diameter | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| diameter | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


