Flourescence polarization assay system and method

Abstract

An instrument is disclosed for fluorescence assays which is capable of reading many independent samples at the same time. This instrument provides enhanced throughput relative to single-sample instruments, and is well-suited to use in general fluorescence, time-resolved fluorescence, multi-band fluorescence, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), and fluorescence polarization. This invention is beneficial in applications such as high-throughput drug screening, and automated clinical testing. Also disclosed are means and methods for a fluorescence polarization measurement which is highly sensitive, inherently self-calibrated, and unaffected by lamp flicker or photobleaching. This fluorescence polarization invention can be practiced on a variety of fluorescence instruments, including prior-art equipment such as microscopes and multi-well plate readers.

Description

[0001] 1. Field of the Invention[0002] The present invention relates to equipment and methods for assaying the amount of optical fluorescence, and the degree of fluorescence polarization, in samples.[0003] 2. Background and Description of the Related Art[0004] Fluorescence Methods and Terminology.[0005] Fluorescence involves exciting a molecular group with light of a first wavelength, causing it subsequently to emit light of a second, longer wavelength. The molecular group is termed a fluorophore, and the first and second types of light are termed "excitation" and "emission" light, respectively. Between excitation and emission, the molecular group is said to be in an excited state. Depending on the molecular group involved, the time spent in the excited state can vary widely, from a few nanoseconds to several microseconds. The duration of the excited state is termed the fluorescence lifetime. It is common to chemically engineer a fluorescent marker compound by grafting a fluorophore...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

However, readout time and instrument cost are increased because of the need for mechanical stepping.

And since only a single detector is required, the cost or complexity of that element can be increased somewhat without great consequence.

Because it measures the two states in time-sequence rather than simultaneously, its accuracy is degraded by fluctuations in the lamp or laser source.

One can employ a reference detector to monitor the source fluctuations, and numerically compensate for variations by e.g. division, but this approach is not entirely successful.

Further, intrinsic changes in the sample during the process of measurement, such as the effects of photobleaching, cannot be corrected.

Finally, mechanical moving parts are normally used to select alternating polarization states, introducing reliability concerns.

However, it has other limitations.

The need for two detectors, two sets of readout circuitry, and sometimes two lenses, means increased cost and complexity.

Both of the FP instrument designs described above read a single sample at a time, and no known commercial FP instrument can read a plurality of samples at once.

This is a weakness for applications such as clinical testing and high-throughput drug screening, since single-sample systems inevitably have lower sample throughput.

While one can conceive of an instrument based upon an array of detectors, polarizers, and sources, the construction of an instrument with competitive price and performance to existing single-sample instruments has not been achieved.

This is a significant limitation of the prior-art designs.

However, it is a sequential-measurement FP reader with all the inherent problems of this approach, as explained above.

Another inherent limitation of all prior-art systems is their need for calibration.

Due to the differences in the optical elements when transmitting the two types of polarized light, and possible detector differences, the system has different responsivity for measurement of I.sub..parallel. and of I.sub..perp.. Since there is no way to assess the relative proportions of I.sub..parallel. and I.sub..perp., this voids the measurement of FP unless the system can be calibrated.

These problems are most severe when two detectors are used, as in a simultaneous measuring system.

It provides methods for measuring the degree of fluorescence polarization through simultaneous-measurement or time-sequential measurement of orthogonally polarized emission components, but all suffer from significant limitations.

Those which employ simultaneous-measurement of orthogonally polarized fluxes have higher cost and parts count, while those employing sequentialmeasurements often require moving parts; they are sensitive to fluctuations in the lamp or laser used to excite fluorescence; and their accuracy can be compromised by the inevitable photobleaching of the sample itself.

Nor does any prior art system enable measuring the fluorescence polarization of many samples at once.

Thus, no prior art system provides a self-calibrated measurement of fluorescence polarization, with high accuracy and the capability to measure many samples at once, for reading multi-well plates, microscope slide samples, and similar applications.

Images